The Industry's Leading Source For F&I, Sales And Technology

Article

Pass the Fee

October 2013, F&I and Showroom - Feature

by Tom Hudson

You can make book on it. At every conference at which I conduct a legal presentation, I can’t get two minutes into the Q-and-A portion of my session before someone asks about bank fees, or acquisition fees.

The fees the questioners are asking about are the ones subprime finance companies charge dealers for buying retail installment sales contracts (RISC), reflecting the obligations of buyers with not-so-good credit. And the questions are always the same: Can I charge those fees to the buyer? If so, how? If not, why?

The answer is a messy stew of federal law, state usury and other laws, and the ability of generally available form RISCs to accommodate the necessary entries required by state and federal law. I’m afraid the only thing I can deliver to questioners is the standard lawyer’s response: “It depends.” In this article, I’ll try to offer a slightly better answer.

The first thing “it depends” on is how the acquisition fees are imposed. Now let’s look at some alternatives:

1. Dealer “Eats” the Fee: If the dealer treats the aggregate amount of such fees as a general overhead item — much like the cost of electricity — not attributable to a particular deal (i.e., “eats” the fee), the fee will not be a finance charge or part of the APR for federal law disclosure purposes and need not be shown on the RISC. The analysis under state law is likely to be the same, but that would need to be confirmed on a state-by-state basis.

2. Dealer Adds the Fee to the Price of the Car: If the dealer wants to separately charge the fee to the buyer in credit transactions in which such a fee is charged, the dealer may be tempted to add the fee to the cash price of the car. In such a case, the fee will be a finance charge and must be disclosed as such for federal law disclosure purposes. The fee will likely be a “prepaid finance charge,” creating tricky federal law disclosure issues in the “Itemization of Amount Financed” that most available RISC forms are not set up to accommodate.

State law issues may also arise since some states have their own disclosure laws, and many states have definitions of “cash price” or similar terminology that would preclude adding the fee to the cash price. Because the fee is likely treated as a finance charge for state law purposes, adding it to the cash price could create state compounding issues.

3. Dealer Charges the Fee as an Item Separate From the Price of the Car: Even trying to charge the fee separately outside of the cash price in a credit transaction can be problematic. Some states limit the fees and finance charges that may be imposed in a consumer credit sales transaction. If support for the fee cannot be found in the state statute or administrative rule, there’s a risk that it’s prohibited.

Some states prohibit finance charges that are imposed in some manner other than by the application of a rate to the buyer’s declining balance, precluding the imposition of an additional dollar amount finance charge. Some states prohibit prepaid finance charges of any sort. Again, many commonly used RISCs are not set up to accommodate the disclosure of these fees.

Finally, if the fee and other finance charges, added together, exceed the state maximum finance charge limit, the fee must be limited to an amount that will not exceed the statutory limit.

So, in an effort to provide something more useful that an “It depends” answer, here’s what we think the answer might be: A dealer could impose the fee on the customer as a separate charge, provided that (i) the fee is disclosed as part of the finance charge and is used to calculate the APR; (ii) state law does not prohibit the fee; (iii) state law permits a prepaid finance charge; (iv) state law permits the calculation of finance charges using methods other than the imposition of a rate on a declining balance; (v) the total finance charge (including the fee) does not exceed the maximum finance charge rate permitted by state law; (vi) the RISC used by the dealership accommodates the disclosure of the fee as a prepaid finance charge; (vii) the dealership’s DMS system is programmed to accurately populate the fields in the RISC; and (viii) whatever method a dealer settles on to charge the fee does not violate the dealer’s agreement with the company that buys the dealer’s finance contracts.

It’s a difficult analysis, and one you don’t want to try on your own. So make sure to get your lawyer involved.

Thomas B. Hudson is a partner in the law firm of Hudson Cook LLP and the author of several widely read compliance manuals available at CounselorLibrary.com. ©Counselor Library.com 2013, all rights reserved. Based on an article from Spot Delivery. Single print publication rights only, to Bobit Business Media. HC# 4820-1591-3238  (10/13).

Comment

  1. 1. David K [ October 17, 2016 @ 03:32PM ]

    Couldn't someone make the case that because dealers are generally not able to discount vehicles on which a sub-prime acquisition is charged that buyers are generally paying more for the vehicle. Thus, in a sense this is an undisclosed cost according to truth in lending.

 

Your Comment

Please note that comments may be moderated. 
Leave this field empty:
Your Name:  
Your Email:  

Blog

So Here's the Deal

Ronald J. Reahard
Menus Don’t Work Miracles

By Ronald J. Reahard
A fancy new menu can help streamline processes and improve customer engagement, but it won’t replace the hard-won skill and compassion of a true F&I professional.

Avoiding the AAA Objection

By Ronald J. Reahard
Top trainer advises F&I pros to eliminate the ‘I have AAA’ objection by downplaying the very real — but relatively minor — roadside assistance benefit included with most service contracts.

(Video) Capture Missed VSC Sales

By Ronald J. Reahard

The Dealer Moved My Goal Posts

By Ronald J. Reahard

Done Deal

Gregory Arroyo
Car Buyers Need F&I

By Gregory Arroyo
Current market trends are playing right into the F&I product pitch, but they also reveal trouble ahead for the automotive retail industry at large.

Protecting F&I’s Future

By Gregory Arroyo
The editor responds to a reader’s question about whether F&I managers are being replaced by iPads and digital retailing tools.

Game Almost Over

By Gregory Arroyo

The Repair Is Covered

By Gregory Arroyo

Mad Marv

Marv Eleazer
'We Never Buy This Stuff'

By Marv Eleazer
Every F&I pro gets the occasional ‘F’ customer, but they’re a small part of your business and they’re not worth a minute of mental anguish.

Stop Painting Dealers With a Broad Brush

By Marv Eleazer
His Madness has a few choice words for media members who obsess over every act of dealer malfeasance while ignoring their charitable and volunteer efforts.

I Love F&I. How About You?

By Marv Eleazer

Is That Legal?

By Marv Eleazer

On the Point

Jim Ziegler
Bound to Fail

By Jim Ziegler
Da Man returns with a message to vehicle manufacturers jumping into the subscription waters: It ain’t gonna happen.

Sharpen Your Survival Skills

By Jim Ziegler
‘Da Man’ has a plan you can use to survive the collapse of the car business and remain profitable through the dealer apocalypse.

Sales Rock Stars Still Exist

By Jim Ziegler

The New Stooges

By Jim Ziegler