The Industry's Leading Source For F&I, Sales And Technology

Mad Marv

Show Me The Process

November 13, 2012

What a conference we enjoyed this year. The trainers did their thing, dealer execs talked compliance safeguards, and the panel sessions hit the mark. There was just so much going on, I couldn’t begin to cover it all. So I thought I’d offer my take on one of the most highly anticipated discussions at this year’s event.

Before I get into it, I wanted to tell you about a dinner experience I had the last night of the conference. I was at Gordon Ramsay’s steakhouse inside the Paris with Mrs. Marv and her parents, who flew into Las Vegas that day. When it came time to order drinks, the server handed me — I kid you not — an iPad. It was definitely slick, but after flipping through 20-plus pages of beers (plus reviews), I was worn out. So, I arbitrarily picked one. But it wasn’t over, because everybody else at the table still had to take their turn with the iPad.

I guess I was hoping for a hard copy or “paper” menu at that point. The problem wasn’t the device. Like I said, it was cool. The problem was the process. There simply wasn’t one. And that’s what I think software makers need to keep in mind as they continue down the path of the tablet menu.

The two-session discussion on the mobile menu began with software makers demonstrating their wares. After a short break, the panel was joined by my friend Tom Wilson, dealership development manager for American Financial and Automotive Services. He said interest in the tablet menu was extremely low when he surveyed dealers in his three-state region, which got the discussion rolling.

Attendees peppered the panelists with an array of questions, from whether they were sure the mobile menu wouldn’t reintroduce old compliance issues to whether the tablet menu is even needed at all. I won’t weigh in on the latter, but I will say that I was disappointed that not one panelist took the opportunity to clearly define a process for their tools that would make them more effective than paper.

As I wrote last month, menus weren’t around when I started in F&I. The primary method of presenting products back then was step selling from the base payment, which, like I also wrote, was a CSI killer because the process was long and tedious. The menu obviously fixed that by speeding up the process while delivering superior results in terms of profit per vehicle retailed and CSI. It got even better when multi-column designs were introduced.

See, I can’t buy into the mobile menu until the software makers devise a process for presenting product that is superior in form and results to the paper version. If they don’t, then their success rate will probably languish, and their tools will only appeal to a small percentage of F&I managers.

What I’m saying is I don’t see a reason to introduce a tablet version if the present format is working just fine.

Now I don’t discount the interest in devices like the iPad. They’re cool and easy to use, and they’ve found their way into everyday life. But that doesn’t mean we have to find a use for it in every situation and activity.

I had a brief discussion with one of the developers after the debate. We batted around a lot of philosophical reasons the iPad may eventually find its way into mainstream F&I, and he concluded that it may be possible the application is ahead of its time. “Don’t scratch me where I don’t itch,” was my reply.

Let’s be frank, software developers, dealers, F&I managers and trainers are always looking for an edge over the competition. And I understand how tantalizing the concept of a mobile menu is, but my opinion doesn’t hold much weight. It’s the customer’s opinion that matters.

I know there are F&I managers out there who are using the tablet menu with some success. My question is, what happens when the shine wears off? Will you ditch the device and return to the paper version? Will the software providers be able to keep up with more complex versions?

Listen, I’m not against the iPad or other tablets. My issue is I have yet to hear someone describe to me a simple, effective process for using a tablet menu.

I will say that there is a place inside the dealership where the tablet can be useful, namely service, sales and the desk. But F&I, by nature, is not mobile. Our work is best conducted in the controlled confines of our offices, mainly because of the nature of what we do. Remember, we are handling our customers’ private information.

So, again, I ask: Why would we need an iPad in our offices? My ears and mind are waiting for an answer.  

Marv Eleazer is a finance manager at Langdale Ford in Valdosta, Ga. E-mail him at marv.eleazer@bobit.com.

Comments

  1. 1. Kathy [ November 17, 2012 @ 07:07AM ]

    Is there or could there be a touch screen were the F&I and /or customer can drag the options they want into there deal, making it interactive. Making the customer feel like they are more in charge. Something that will calculate the payments as they switch options. I can see that to be something of interest with todays buyers.

  2. 2. Mad Marv [ November 19, 2012 @ 11:42AM ]

    itapmenu
    iasdirect
    maximtrak
    otiservices
    theimpactgroup
    menusys.com

    I don't endorse any of these but they are the premier companies offering iPad based systems thereby making F&I a "mobile" concept. Some are more adaptable to customer interaction than others and your preference will determine if they can work for you.

    I continue maintaining the position that the practitioner IS the menu-not the medium. That being said, it's possible for a producer to do better with an electronic device than perhaps a paper one but only because the paper version may be so difficult to understand or present that the simplicity of design of the software may be easier. I've never been an advocate of 4/5 column formats and can understand why a few people would gravitate to plastic.

    If the practitioner follows their training and adheres to the conventional wisdom of offering every product the customer qualifies for with the right attitude then I can see no advantage the plastic version holds other than the cool factor.

    My contention here has always been the process of an electronic mobile menu is not superior to that of paper. The plastic version doesn't solve a problem that already exist's nor does it fill a void the paper one can't address.

  3. 3. Max [ August 06, 2013 @ 05:12AM ]

    I don't see why an gigantic iPad like an docupad would harm out process. It is very well designed just for our particular designs, I've demo'd the product myself and it made me feel like I was in control (but not). Also different languages don't hurt especially to a complete foreigner who doesn't speak the language. Anyways Marv, love your posts however wanted to know your option on these specific Docupads

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email: (Email will not be displayed.)  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that comments may be moderated.

Author Bio

Marv Eleazer

Finance Director

Marv is no insider. He’s an actual F&I manager with more than 20 years of experience. Get his from-the-trenches take on the industry every month at fi-magazine.com.

» More