The Industry's Leading Source For F&I, Sales And Technology

Special Finance®

Attorneys General Demand Vehicle History Disclosures

November 25, 2008

SEATTLE – Forty-two attorneys general are seeking a tune-up for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)'s Used Car Rule. They are asking the agency to add additional disclosures about a vehicle's history to the Buyer's Guide notice displayed on cars available for purchase from dealers.

"Laws are like cars, they need regular maintenance to make sure they're operating effectively," said Rob McKenna, attorney general for the State of Washington. "The federal Used Car Rule is rusty and needs tuning to perform properly for consumers."

The current Used Car Rule requires that Buyer's Guide notices be posted on used vehicles offered for sale at dealerships. The notices indicate whether a car is covered by a warranty or sold "as-is."

But the law doesn't require additional information about a vehicle's history to be printed on the guide, such as whether cars have been assigned titles that would indicate damage from a flood or crash or if the car was repurchased by a manufacturer under a state's Lemon Law. In Washington, a state law requires dealers to disclose a vehicle’s history – but only if the buyer requests it.

"Nothing diminishes the market value of a used vehicle more than detrimental history," the attorneys general stated in their comments. Damaged vehicles may also pose safety hazards, they added.

Amending the Buyer's Guide to require prior-damage information would help prevent fraud and omissions of material fact, they said, noting that Wisconsin already requires such information to be disclosed on its Buyer’s Guide, a regulation approved by the FTC.

"There simply is no excuse for the national Buyer's Guide to fail to include vehicle history and title brand information," the AGs wrote. "That information is readily available to dealers through private data sources and through title records accompanying vehicle they purchase at auction or take in trade ... If Wisconsin dealers are required and can determine facts sufficient to make that disclosure, so too should dealers in the rest of the nation."

The comments to the FTC were written by Iowa's attorney general and signed by the following attorneys general: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, the District of Columbia and the Northern Mariana Islands. They also incorporate comments from the International Association of Lemon Law Administrators.

Your Comment

Please note that comments may be moderated. 
Leave this field empty:
Your Name:  
Your Email:  

CLOSE [X]

READ NEXT

CUDL, Manheim Working to Connect Credit Unions with Dealers

Indirect lending services provider CUDL and remarketing solutions provider Manheim Financial Services (MAFS) have announced a further roll-out of the MAFS Advantage program. The two companies launched MAFS Advantage more than a year ago as part of a joint effort to connect credit unions with the 15,000 independent auto dealers that MAFS serves nationwide.