FI showroom red and grey logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

R.I.P. Payment Packing

The AFIP’s executive director says it’s time to say goodbye and good riddance to a relic of F&I’s past. He explains why ‘a little wiggle room’ hurts new-car gross and puts sales at risk.

by David Robertson
November 14, 2015
4 min to read


It’s time to pay our last respects to payment packing. What started out innocently as “a little wiggle room” has morphed, in some dealerships, into a bastardization of payment quoting and F&I product pitching processes.

When a customer asks how much a vehicle costs, just tell him how much the damn thing costs, not the selling price plus however many hidden dollars you need to sell an aftermarket product. The regulators expect it, consumers deserve it and ethical business practices dictate full and accurate disclosure.

Ad Loading...

Besides being duplicitous, payment packing is counterproductive and a relic of the past. Let me explain why.

First, payment packing negatively impacts new-car gross and puts sales at risk. Statistically, nearly 90% of all car buyers fall into one of two categories: For the vast majority, the purchase decision is based strictly on whether they can afford the monthly payment. For others, the question is, “On a cost-benefit scale, is what I expect to gain from the vehicle commensurate with the monthly obligation?” The anticipated benefits can range from basic utility to the “Wow” factor. In other words, “How much will this car’s gas mileage save me annually on my commute?” vs. “How impressed will my golf buddies be if I drive up in this vehicle?”

In nearly every case, the purchase decision is contingent upon the amount of the monthly obligation. If the payment is packed, the selling price of the vehicle is artificially higher than it should be. If the bump causes the monthly payment to be more than the customer can afford or is willing to pay, he has two options: He can keep grinding on the salesperson — further reducing the gross to hit his purchase decision trigger point — or shop elsewhere.

A $35 bump on a 72-month contract is $2,520, which is a significant amount of money. As salespeople, we’ve all had prospective buyers walk for less than $35 a month or $2,520 in trade difference. Personally, I wouldn’t sell cars in a store that packed payments, even if I received a small piece of the F&I pie. If I get paid for selling cars — and doing so ethically — I should have the opportunity to optimize my income potential from each sale. Let the F&I person give it his or her best shot to do likewise.

In an era of über-documentation, manipulating the payment mouse will prove to be more difficult. The CFPB isn’t pushing for digital transactions to save paper. Its objective is the ease of conducting dealer data audits. However, in this case, the digitization sword cuts both ways. Software will be available for the dealer to self-audit each transaction at the time the sale is consummated.

Ad Loading...

Who benefits from the packed payment, anyway? From a dollars-and-cents perspective, the best the customer can do is break even. Using the numbers above, the customer overpaid $35 per month for the car and underpaid the same amount for a VSC. If the reduced retail price of the VSC was the key to the purchase decision, the customer benefited from the coverage. However, all too often, some or all of the packed dollars are posted to the F&I gross — with a portion, in many cases, ending up in the pay vouchers of those “desking” the deals.

The payment packing holdouts have two choices: They can quickly and quietly lay the practice to rest or, judging from reports in the trade press, they can learn how expensive it will be if they keep doing it.

In the simplest terms, payment packing means the seller is deceptively overstating the monthly payment to a buyer, typically for the seller’s enrichment. Logic dictates that this business practice will not be tolerated. The 49 states without a payment packing statute will likely follow California’s lead in expressly prohibiting the practice. As evidenced by recent actions, there are state and federal laws already on the books to make it a prosecutable offense.

As an industry, we are paying dearly for questionable choices made by some dealers in the past. And we can’t effectively put the past behind us until we fully abandon its relics.

David Robertson is executive director of the Association of Finance & Insurance Professionals (AFIP). Email him at david.robertson@bobit.com.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Auto Finance

A fan of $100 bills sitting on a white envelope
Auto Financeby Hannah MitchellAugust 12, 2026

July Was Hot for Auto Borrowers

Credit proved readily available for many, but most loans left buyers in negative territory, Cox Automotive said.

Read More →
stacks of coins, a calculator, paperwork, and a pair of glasses in the background, text Lender Experience Drives Dealer Decisions, F&I and Showroom
Auto Financeby Lauren LawrenceAugust 12, 2026

Dealer Lender Preferences Revealed

When lenders provide consistent, fast service, their overall satisfaction scores with dealers greatly improve, according to JD Power research.

Read More →
man sitting at desk using a calculator
Auto Financeby Lauren LawrenceAugust 10, 2026

Auto Refi Savings Surge

Consumers with 84-month auto loan terms who refinanced saved the most on monthly payments, according to a new report by auto refinancing provider Caribou.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Tiny toy car in front of small stacks of coins
Auto Financeby Hannah MitchellAugust 5, 2026

Subaru Enters Lending Business

The automaker follows other brands in adding captive financing in the U.S., and says the move will strengthen its position here.

Read More →
Man climbing ladder in front of mountain landscape.
Auto Financeby Lauren LawrenceAugust 3, 2026

Positive Equity Reaches Record High

Mainstream vehicle owners who bought a car seven years ago are likely to have positive equity when trading in for a new vehicle, according to second-quarter Edmunds data.

Read More →
Photo of document next to calculator and inkpen
Auto FinanceJuly 20, 2026

Dealerships Are Paying the Price for Extended Car Loans

Growing negative-equity scenarios mean such lengthy terms should be addressed in a forward-looking way to make them work for the dealer and the consumer down the road.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
silver car in background with hand in front holding out a set of keys, Trade-In Trouble, F&I and Showroom
Auto Financeby Lauren LawrenceJuly 20, 2026

Trade-Ins in Negative Equity Reach New Heights

As such trade-ins rise in frequency, so do monthly loan payment amounts and interest rates, according to second-quarter data compiled by Edmunds.

Read More →
Two men in suit jackets shaking hands in front of a new-looking white vehicle
Auto Financeby Hannah MitchellJuly 15, 2026

Auto Credit Plentiful

June numbers show lenders are readily granting access, including to risky borrowers, as consumers leverage themselves to take on high prices.

Read More →
Woman's hands holding an wallet empty of cash
Auto Financeby Hannah MitchellJuly 1, 2026

Automotive Consumers Sink Further in Debt

Most financing metrics hit records in the second quarter as more buyers locked themselves into long terms and high monthly payments.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Three men smiling for headshots
Auto Financeby Lauren LawrenceJuly 1, 2026

Porsche Financial Services Shifts Structure

After 36 years with Porsche, the Financial Services Chief Financial Officer Konrad Riedl is retiring, and the department is realigning its management structure.

Read More →