Dealer Fined $690,000 for Consumer-Protection Law Violations
A used-car dealership will pay more than $690,000 after a New Jersey Superior Court Judge found that it violated state consumer protection laws and regulations a total of 640 times.
NEWARK, N.J. — A used car dealership has been ordered to pay $693,645.91 after a Superior Court Judge found that it violated state consumer protection laws and regulations a total of 640 times.
The state’s ten-count complaint against RLMB Inc., filed this March, alleged that RLMB and its manager, Michael L. Bloom, violated the Consumer Fraud Act, the Motor Vehicle Advertising Regulations, the Automotive Sales Regulations, the Used Car Lemon Law (UCLL) and UCLL regulations by, among other things, advertising used motor vehicles for sale without disclosing to consumers the vehicle’s prior damage or prior use; selling vehicles “as is” when they qualified for a warranty; and permitting third parties to advertise, offer for sale and/or sell used motor vehicles on Craigslist that were titled to RLMB.
The dealership and Bloom failed to file a response to the complaint, resulting in Judge Stephan C. Hansbury entering a final judgment by default. The judgment requires the defendants to pay $640,000 in civil penalties, $31,200.91 in reimbursement to the State for its legal and investigative costs and $22,445 in restitution to seven consumers. By the terms of the judgment, the dealership must comply with all applicable state laws and regulations in its business practices.
“The penalty ordered in this matter is appropriate and should send a clear message to all motor vehicle dealerships that violating our consumer protection laws and regulations comes at a steep price,” Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman said. “We are continuing to review the practices of new and used motor vehicle dealers to ensure consumers are not taken advantage of.”
“The evidence presented to the court by the Division of Consumer Affairs, resulted in a favorable decision for consumers,” said Acting State Director of Consumer Affairs Steve Lee. “Dealerships must not withhold information from consumers that the dealerships are required by law to provide.”
According to the complaint, RLMB required consumers to sign blank sales documents, did not prominently display the Federal Trade Commission Used Car Buyers Guide in vehicles for sale, did not conspicuously post the total sale price of vehicles, failed to itemize documentary service fees, and did not pay the $.50 administrative fee for each used motor vehicle sold, as required by the UCLL, among other things.
More Compliance

Dueling Banjos in the Car Biz
Reports and accounts at variance show auto dealers’ trust profiles have risen in many consumers’ minds but that there remains a need for greater transparency by some.
Read More →
NADA and the Miracle on 34th Street
Automotive dealers should follow the National Automobile Dealers Association's consumer-friendly guidelines in order to minimize their legal risks.
Read More →
Another Look at a Recent Data Breach
Get caught up on the most pressing legal and regulatory matters facing dealers and F&I professionals, including data security, shotgun purchases, and inconsistent payment quotes.
Read More →

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems
Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.
Read More →
Fines of the Times
Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.
Read More →
Goodwill and Car Dealers
A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.
Read More →
The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back
President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law
Read More →
How to Clear a Red Flag
Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.
Read More →
