DOJ Settles Nissan Captive Case for $3M
The U.S. Department of Justice announced Nissan Motor Acceptance will pay $3 million to settle charges that it unlawfully repossessed 113 vehicles belonging to active military members.

The U.S. Department of Justice has ended a three-year investigation into alleged violations of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act by Nissan’s captive finance company with a $3 million settlement.
Photo courtesy U.S. Department of Defense via Flickr
WASHINGTON — Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. will pay $3 million in compensation and penalties in a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, officials announced. The agreement ends an investigation into suspected violations of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that began in 2016.
NMAC will create a $2.9 million fund from which 113 complainants will be compensated for fees and other costs arising from repossessions and lease terminations. The captive owes an additional $62,000 in fines to the federal government.
Since 2003, the SCRA has required creditors to obtain a court order for the repossession of a vehicle belonging to an active military member if a deposit or payment was made before they entered service. It also allows those who are activated or relocated to terminate leases early without penalty.
“The SCRA exists to offer protections to our military service members and to minimize undue financial burdens associated with deployments and other instances where our military servicemembers experience a profound and prolonged lifestyle change,” said U.S. Attorney Don Cochran, for the Middle District of Tennessee. “We will aggressively hold those institutions and businesses accountable who are required to comply with the Act. Our military deserves no less.”
In a statement to news outlets, NMAC executives wrote, “NMAC denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle with the Department of Justice in the best interest for all parties. NMAC worked closely with the DOJ to reach the settlement agreement and to provide appropriate relief for affected service members.”
More Auto Finance

Interest Rates Further Squeeze Auto Consumers
Last month’s hike and a potential second increase this month add to a growing list of inflation woes that could continue to dent overall car sales.
Read More →
Mind Your Process
Consistent steps taken in various aspects of the F&I office can make valuable differences over time, similar to an outline for a best-selling book.
Read More →
Top Five Credit Application Fraud Flags
Compliance audits regularly reveal bad habits that can lead to fraud charges and should have been stamped out decades ago.
Read More →
More Auto Loans for the Taking in August
Riskier categories were on the uptick for the month as lenders loosened access in several areas while balancing out the exposure in another, Cox Automotive reported.
Read More →
July Was Hot for Auto Borrowers
Credit proved readily available for many, but most loans left buyers in negative territory, Cox Automotive said.
Read More →
Dealer Lender Preferences Revealed
When lenders provide consistent, fast service, their overall satisfaction scores with dealers greatly improve, according to JD Power research.
Read More →
Auto Refi Savings Surge
Consumers with 84-month auto loan terms who refinanced saved the most on monthly payments, according to a new report by auto refinancing provider Caribou.
Read More →
Subaru Enters Lending Business
The automaker follows other brands in adding captive financing in the U.S., and says the move will strengthen its position here.
Read More →
Positive Equity Reaches Record High
Mainstream vehicle owners who bought a car seven years ago are likely to have positive equity when trading in for a new vehicle, according to second-quarter Edmunds data.
Read More →
Dealerships Are Paying the Price for Extended Car Loans
Growing negative-equity scenarios mean such lengthy terms should be addressed in a forward-looking way to make them work for the dealer and the consumer down the road.
Read More →