Edmunds.com Reports Large Vehicles Receive Most Subsidization; Large Trucks Gain Most Market Share
Edmunds.com (www.edmunds.com), an online resource for automotive information, reported that the average manufacturer incentive per vehicle sold in the United States was $2,668 in July 2003, up $519 or 24.2 percent from July 2002 and up 1.7 percent from June 2003. Industry average days-to-turn, which measures how many days on average it takes to sell a vehicle after it hits the dealer's lot, reached a record level in July at 73 days, up significantly from last July's average of 60 days, says the report.
Edmunds.com's monthly True Cost of Incentives (TCI) report takes into account all of the manufacturers' various United States incentives programs, including subvented interest rates and lease programs as well as cash rebates to consumers and dealers. To ensure the greatest possible accuracy, Edmunds.com says it bases its calculations on sales volume, including the mix of vehicle makes and models for each month, as well as on the proportion of vehicles for which each type of incentive was used.
According to the report, incentives spending for domestic Chrysler, Ford and General Motors nameplates hit a record high of $3,631 per unit in incentives in July, compared to $1,873 for European automakers, $1,447 for Korean automakers, and $1,075 for Japanese automakers.
Of the domestics, only Chrysler reduced incentives spending in July, down 9.2 percent from June to $3,172 per unit, while its market share decreased to its lowest level since August 2001, 11.8 percent, which was down by 1.7 percent from the prior month. Ford's incentives spending went up by 3.8 percent to $3,377 per unit in July while its market share decreased to 18.1 percent, one of its lowest levels in the last several years. In July, General Motors raised its incentives spending by 7 percent to $3,969 per unit, while increasing its market share by 1.2 percent to 29.7 percent.
"Almost the entire market share lost by the domestic manufacturers within the last year was captured by the Japanese automakers, while incentives on domestic vehicles have consistently been three times those offered on Japanese nameplates," stated Dr. Jane Liu, executive director of Data Analysis for Edmunds.com.
Among vehicle segment, large SUVs had the highest average incentives this month at $4,045, followed by large cars at $3,595 and large trucks at $3,459. Sports cars had the lowest average incentives at $1,263, followed by luxury SUVs at $1,525 and luxury sports cars at $1,797. Large trucks have gained the most market share since July 2002, up 3.2 percent to 14.5 percent, while midsize cars have lost the most market share during that period, down 3.3 percent to 15.7 percent.
About Edmunds.com True Cost of Incentives(TCI)
Edmunds.com's TCI is a comprehensive monthly report that measures automobile manufacturers' cost of incentives on vehicles sold in the United States. These costs are reported on a per vehicle basis for the industry as a whole, for each manufacturer, for each make sold by each manufacturer and for each model of each make. TCI covers all aspects of manufacturers' various incentives programs (except volume and similar bonus programs), including dealer cash, manufacturer rebates and consumer savings from subvented APR and lease programs (including subvented lease residual values used in manufacturer leasing programs). Data for the industry, the manufacturers and the makes are derived using weighted averages and are based on actual monthly sales and financing activity.
About Edmunds.com, Inc.
Edmunds.com is an online resource for automotive information. Its comprehensive set of data, tools and services, including Edmunds.com True Market Value® pricing, is generated by Edmunds Data Services and is licensed to third parties. The company is headquartered in Santa Monica, California and maintains a satellite office in Troy, Michigan.
More F&I

Why Your F&I PVR Is Misleading You
Here’s a handy checklist of the numbers to track in 2026 instead.
Read More →
Auto Consumer Anxiety Presents Opportunity
A survey of U.S. drivers found the majority are concerned about finances and the economy, but those fears make many ready to buy vehicle-protection products.
Read More →
Humble and Hungry: 12 Rules for an F&I Life
Dustin Gingerich, with a decade in the F&I business under his belt, shares his thoughts on leadership, building trust with customers, and the importance of learning and innovation.
Read More →
Focus on the Opening
F&I managers must learn as much as possible about their customers, starting before they walk into their offices. The bulk of today’s consumers expect that, and good results will follow.
Read More →
F&I Reaches for the Sky
The increasingly important profit center continued making gains in the first quarter, according to StoneEagle data, ancillary products proving more popular as consumers hold onto their buys longer.
Read More →
Timing the Market Can Hurt Long-Term Program Performance
For dealer-owned reinsurance entities, avoiding volatility entirely can mean falling behind inflation and missing market rebounds that drive long term surplus growth. Missing just a handful of strong market days can materially impact cumulative returns—an important reminder for long horizon trust and investment strategies.
Read More →
The 90/10 Rule
In this video, Ryan Ruff explains the rule that elite sales professionals use to turn ordinary conversations into unforgettable customer experiences.
Read More →
Your Office Is Talking
What’s the atmosphere saying about you to your customers? You can make minor adjustments and additions that transform your space into one that creates trust with the people on the other side of the desk.
Read More →
F&I Training Fundamentals
How can auto dealerships help F&I managers fulfill their vital role in the most effective ways? Industry expert Rick McCormick shares his insights on the best ways to train these professionals and help them maintain good habits.
Read More →
Not Just Any Tire Will Do
More consumers and businesses are opting for all-season options for various reasons as safety, sustainability and convenience push practical change.
Read More →