Jury Orders Reagor to Pay Ford Credit $53M
A jury deliberated for less than an hour before deciding Reagor Dykes’ Bart Reagor owes Ford Motor Credit Co. the full amount it demanded following an investigation into the Texas group’s floorplanning practices.

Bart Reagor (above) and former Reagor Dykes Auto Group partner Rick Dykes have each agreed or been ordered to pay damages exceeding $50 million to Ford Motor Credit Co.
LUBBOCK, Texas — A Texas jury determined dealer Bart Reagor owes Ford Motor Credit Co. more than $53 million, including $36 million for selling vehicles out of trust, the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal reports.
The captive finance company sued Reagor and his former partner, Rick Dykes, last August, one day after a Ford Credit audit of the Reagor Dykes Auto Group’s six dealerships. Dykes reached a $58 million settlement with the company earlier this year. The award and settlement have no bearing on an ongoing criminal investigation.
Read: Texas Dealer Sent to Mediation Over Ford Objections
The $53,759,450.96 award was based on calculations by Ford Credit analysts. Reagor’s attorneys said they deserved much less, considering the Dykes settlement and the fact that Ford Credit had already recovered $64 million in bankruptcy proceedings. Ford Credit initially sought $112 million in damages.
“No matter what happened behind the scenes at Reagor Dykes Auto Group, principals Reagor and Dykes are the ones who signed contracts with the creditors.”
Writing for the Avalanche Journal, reporter Sarah Self-Walbrick noted the dealers were unable to discharge amounts owed to their lending partner in bankruptcy as they may have once hoped.
“Ford Credit argued in a January filing that no matter what happened behind the scenes at Reagor-Dykes Auto Group, principals Reagor and Dykes are the ones who signed contracts with the creditors and should therefore be held accountable,” Self-Walbrick wrote. “Both parties on Wednesday agreed Reagor’s personal guarantees were binding.”
More Compliance

Dueling Banjos in the Car Biz
Reports and accounts at variance show auto dealers’ trust profiles have risen in many consumers’ minds but that there remains a need for greater transparency by some.
Read More →
NADA and the Miracle on 34th Street
Automotive dealers should follow the National Automobile Dealers Association's consumer-friendly guidelines in order to minimize their legal risks.
Read More →
Another Look at a Recent Data Breach
Get caught up on the most pressing legal and regulatory matters facing dealers and F&I professionals, including data security, shotgun purchases, and inconsistent payment quotes.
Read More →

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems
Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.
Read More →
Fines of the Times
Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.
Read More →
Goodwill and Car Dealers
A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.
Read More →
The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back
President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law
Read More →
How to Clear a Red Flag
Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.
Read More →
