Soon the Big Three Won't Be: Wall Street Journal
The era of the Big Three automakers is ending, according to the Wall Street Journal. After 60 years of dominance in North America, General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group are seeing their collective market share steadily erode, with little hope that they can reverse the trend, according to a story in the Journal by Joseph B. White, Gregory L. White and Norihiko Shirouzu.
The main cause of this untoward development -- foretold in 1998 by Chrysler's decision to abandon its independence and become part of German auto giant DaimlerChrysler AG -- is the huge and successful investment by foreign
rivals in new North American factories and vehicles. Equally important, European and Asian manufacturers are making cars that many American
consumers prefer, based on quality and technological sophistication.
The Japanese gain a further advantage because their factories tend to run more efficiently, according to the Journal. And the strong dollar has accelerated the market shift by
making foreign models effectively less expensive for American buyers.
The once-unquestioned titans of Detroit remain major players on the global scene. Jarred from the complacency bred by record profits in the late 1990s, The Big Three all have shaken up their top managements recently and vow to battle back with renewed vigor. But as competition in the auto market has become truly international, it is highly unlikely that GM, Ford and Chrysler will ever regain the
dominance that once allowed them to dictate which vehicles Americans bought and at what prices, according to the Journal.
Forced to reshape themselves into smaller companies, GM, Ford and Chrysler will collaborate more extensively with Japanese and
European rivals and simultaneously try to shed more of their own employees, the Journalpredicts.
At the retail level, major dealer networks have acknowledged the new order by pushing foreign brands more aggressively. That tactic only hastens the decline of the Big Three, according to the Journal.
More F&I

Integrating Nontraditional F&I Products
The niche presents a strategic advantage for auto dealerships as they move to adapt to fast-changing consumer expectations in today’s market.
Read More →
Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →
Amplify 2026 Billed as Turning Innovation Into Results
Reynolds and Reynolds says its annual retail summit will connect dealers with practical strategies, peer insight, and technology-driven ideas.
Read More →
Own Your Outcome: F&I in the Digital Customer Journey
Finance has historically been the last step in the car-buying process, but it doesn’t have to be. The customer’s journey starts long before they arrive at the dealership, and so should F&I’s involvement.
Read More →
Tariffs Could Raise Insurance Premiums
As U.S. import tariffs affect repair costs, consumers might find it more affordable to replace a damaged vehicle, according to recent Insurify tariff analysis.
Read More →
Smaller Loans, Longer Terms
The youngest generation of car buyers is more likely to finance less expensive vehicles, more than half of generation Z consumers borrowing less than $25,000.
Read More →
New Lifetime Battery F&I Product Meant to Drive Dealer Traffic
EFG Cos. offering is intended to create lifetime auto dealer engagement with customers.
Read More →
The Psychology Behind Menus That Increase Add-On Sales
There is a science to crafting a menu that gives customers confidence in the choices presented, and moving the process outside the F&I office can further boost results.
Read More →
Why Your F&I PVR Is Misleading You
Here’s a handy checklist of the numbers to track in 2026 instead.
Read More →
Auto Consumer Anxiety Presents Opportunity
A survey of U.S. drivers found the majority are concerned about finances and the economy, but those fears make many ready to buy vehicle-protection products.
Read More →