U.S. Manufacturers Continue to Increase Incentive Spending in February, Says Edmunds.com
Edmunds.com estimated today that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,914 per vehicle sold in February 2009, up $216, or 8.0 percent, from January 2009, and up $400, or 15.9 percent, from February 2008.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated today that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,914 per vehicle sold in February 2009, up $216, or 8.0 percent, from January 2009, and up $400, or 15.9 percent, from February 2008.
“Automakers are spending at remarkable levels, but it is worth noting that in February, 27 percent of new car intenders switched to a used vehicle at the dealership,” according to Edmunds.com CEO Jeremy Anwyl. “This is up from 16 percent in recent months and highlights an opportunity for automakers struggling to make monthly sales.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,991 per vehicle sold in February 2009, up from $3,518 in January 2009. From January 2009 to February 2009, European automakers increased incentives spending by $67 to $3,150 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers decreased incentives spending by $77 to $1,698 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers increased incentives spending by $102 to $3,031 per vehicle sold.
"The last time sales were at this level was in the early 1980s, when the country had 25 percent fewer licensed drivers," stated Jesse Toprak, executive director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. "Back then, you could practically buy a new car for the amount that some of today’s automakers are spending on per-vehicle incentives.”
True Cost of Incentives for the "Big Six" Automakers
Automaker February 2009 January 2009 February 2008
Chrysler Group $5,566* $4,291 $3,520
Ford $3,430 $3,505 $3,317
General Motors $3,584 $3,138 $3,328
Honda $1,249 $1,374 $1,209
Nissan $2,509 $2,153 $2,159
Toyota $1,744 $1,994 $1,044
Industry Average $2,914 $2,698 $2,514
*Denotes a monthly record for the indicated automaker.
"Ironically, the word ‘incentive’ hardly applies to the money being spent by automakers right now," commented Edmunds' AutoObserver.com senior editor Michelle Krebs. "Consumers are simply not motivated to buy based on what they are seeing in the marketplace, and are instead waiting for a boost of economic confidence before making a major purchase."
In February 2009, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $1.9 billion, up 12.5 percent from January 2009. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.2 billion, or 59.8 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $472 million, or 23.7 percent; European manufacturers spent $173 million, or 8.7 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $154 million, or 7.8 percent.
Among vehicle segments, premium sport cars had the highest average incentives, $6,331 per vehicle sold, followed by luxury SUVs at $4,329. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $762, followed by compact cars at $1,578. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large trucks averaged the highest, 13.1 percent, followed by large cars at 13.0 percent of sticker price. Subcompact cars averaged the lowest with 4.7 percent and premium luxury cars followed with 5.1 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands, in February Scion spent $70 followed by MINI at $86 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Chrysler spent the most, $6,061, followed by Dodge at $5,674 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Chrysler and Dodge spent the most, 20.7 percent and 19.0 percent of sticker price, respectively; while MINI spent virtually nothing and Scion spent 0.4 percent.
More F&I

Integrating Nontraditional F&I Products
The niche presents a strategic advantage for auto dealerships as they move to adapt to fast-changing consumer expectations in today’s market.
Read More →
Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →
Amplify 2026 Billed as Turning Innovation Into Results
Reynolds and Reynolds says its annual retail summit will connect dealers with practical strategies, peer insight, and technology-driven ideas.
Read More →
Own Your Outcome: F&I in the Digital Customer Journey
Finance has historically been the last step in the car-buying process, but it doesn’t have to be. The customer’s journey starts long before they arrive at the dealership, and so should F&I’s involvement.
Read More →
Tariffs Could Raise Insurance Premiums
As U.S. import tariffs affect repair costs, consumers might find it more affordable to replace a damaged vehicle, according to recent Insurify tariff analysis.
Read More →
Smaller Loans, Longer Terms
The youngest generation of car buyers is more likely to finance less expensive vehicles, more than half of generation Z consumers borrowing less than $25,000.
Read More →
New Lifetime Battery F&I Product Meant to Drive Dealer Traffic
EFG Cos. offering is intended to create lifetime auto dealer engagement with customers.
Read More →
The Psychology Behind Menus That Increase Add-On Sales
There is a science to crafting a menu that gives customers confidence in the choices presented, and moving the process outside the F&I office can further boost results.
Read More →
Why Your F&I PVR Is Misleading You
Here’s a handy checklist of the numbers to track in 2026 instead.
Read More →
Auto Consumer Anxiety Presents Opportunity
A survey of U.S. drivers found the majority are concerned about finances and the economy, but those fears make many ready to buy vehicle-protection products.
Read More →