Lawsuit Alleges Deceptive Practices at Group's Stores
Two former employees allege supervisors at three Illinois stores encouraged deceitful practices involving auto lenders.

The complaint alleges supervisors retaliated against employees when they refused to engage in fraudulent activities.
Pixabay
Two former employees have filed a lawsuit against Kunes Auto Group, accusing supervisors at three Illinois stores of encouraging deceitful practices involving auto lenders.
The complaint, filed on March 30, alleges the supervisors retaliated against former employees Scott Grodeck and Edward Boliaux when they refused to engage in fraudulent activities at the Kunes stores in Sycamore, Ill. The lawsuit alleges the fraudulent practices included:
Power-booking, a tactic whereby dealers report nonexistent features to deceive lenders into approving loans for amounts exceeding the vehicle's actual value.
Inflating down payments
Misleading lenders about customers' financial capabilities
One scheme artificially raised vehicle prices, applying a false "rebate" and using it as part of the down payment.
The lawsuit also claims that Kunes Auto Group encouraged customers to apply for loans through DigniFi, a lending platform primarily designed for car service, repairs, purchases and accessories. The borrowed money was then allegedly utilized as a down payment, which is considered a deceptive practice. The former employees say they were repeatedly pressured to use the DigniFi strategy at Kunes Auto Mall.
The lawsuit alleges that the president of Kunes Auto Group, Gregg Kunes, and CEO Scott Kunes were aware of the fraudulent practices. It names Kunes Hyundai General Manager Martin Epstein, Kunes Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep-Ram General Manager Phillip Lafata and Sycamore Regional Manager John Shaw as individuals who encouraged and participated in the alleged fraud.
The former employees claim Epstein assured them that the Kunes family and Shaw approved of their involvement in fraudulent activities. When Grodeck refused to comply, the lawsuit states the deal was taken away from him.
The defendants in the lawsuit have denied the allegations, stating the complaint is without merit. They emphasize their dedication to customers, employees and the community and express their intention to prove the allegations made by the former employees are false.
Originally posted on Auto Dealer Today
More Compliance

Dueling Banjos in the Car Biz
Reports and accounts at variance show auto dealers’ trust profiles have risen in many consumers’ minds but that there remains a need for greater transparency by some.
Read More →
NADA and the Miracle on 34th Street
Automotive dealers should follow the National Automobile Dealers Association's consumer-friendly guidelines in order to minimize their legal risks.
Read More →
Another Look at a Recent Data Breach
Get caught up on the most pressing legal and regulatory matters facing dealers and F&I professionals, including data security, shotgun purchases, and inconsistent payment quotes.
Read More →

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems
Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.
Read More →
Fines of the Times
Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.
Read More →
Goodwill and Car Dealers
A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.
Read More →
The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back
President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law
Read More →
How to Clear a Red Flag
Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.
Read More →
