EEOC Says BMW Dealer Discriminated Against Older Workers
The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says BMW Cleveland violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act when it terminated two older salesmen and failed to rehire a former service manager.

EEOC officials say an Ohio BMW dealership violated federal law in its handling of three older workers.
Photo by RoadOver via Flickr
CLEVELAND — Davis Automotive Group Inc. violated federal law by intentionally subjecting older workers at BMW Cleveland to age discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charged in a lawsuit filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio’s Eastern Division.
According to the suit, the Solon, Ohio, dealership discriminated against a former employee by refusing to rehire her because of her age (52) and for terminating two sales employees because of their ages (67 and 70).
Read: EEOC Sues Okla. Dealer for Refusing to Hire Female Salesperson
As a result of these practices, officials say, the company violated the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act, which prohibits age discrimination in employment against people age 40 or older, according to the lawsuit.
The charging documents note the EEOC attempted to reach a settlement before moving forward with the lawsuit, which seeks monetary relief, including back pay and liquidated damages, for the three former employees.
“Failing to employ and discharging qualified people because of their age is not only unfair, it is against the law.”
The suit also seeks injunctive relief to prevent future age discrimination, including an order to institute policies, practices, and procedures that conform to the requirements of federal law.
“Failing to employ and discharging qualified people because of their age is not only unfair, it is against the law,” said Debra Lawrence, regional attorney for EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office. “We will continue to combat these abhorrent employment practices that violate federal law as well as common justice.”
Originally posted on Auto Dealer Today
More Compliance

Dueling Banjos in the Car Biz
Reports and accounts at variance show auto dealers’ trust profiles have risen in many consumers’ minds but that there remains a need for greater transparency by some.
Read More →
NADA and the Miracle on 34th Street
Automotive dealers should follow the National Automobile Dealers Association's consumer-friendly guidelines in order to minimize their legal risks.
Read More →
Another Look at a Recent Data Breach
Get caught up on the most pressing legal and regulatory matters facing dealers and F&I professionals, including data security, shotgun purchases, and inconsistent payment quotes.
Read More →

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems
Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.
Read More →
Fines of the Times
Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.
Read More →
Goodwill and Car Dealers
A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.
Read More →
The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back
President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law
Read More →
How to Clear a Red Flag
Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.
Read More →
