House Committee Votes to Repeal CFPB Auto Lending Guidance
The House Financial Services Committee passed a bill this week that would bring more transparency to the CFPB’s guidance-making process. If approved by Congress, it would effectively repeal the bulletin the bureau issued last year on indirect auto lending.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A bill supporters believe will bring more transparency into the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s guidance-making process was passed by the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday.
The bill, H.R. 4811, adds safeguards such as requiring prior public notice and greater transparency of future CFPB guidance. In addition, the bill would rescind a bulletin the bureau issued in March 2013. It stated that auto finance sources would be held responsible for discriminatory pricing resulting from policies that permit dealers to mark up interest rates as compensation for services rendered. The CFPB would be allowed to reissue the guidance, but with transparency and public review.
The Guidance Transparency Act bill passed the committee on a bipartisan 35-to-24 vote, with Democrats Joyce Beatty (Ohio), Steven Horsford (Nev.) and David Scott (Ga.) supporting the bill. It now heads to the full House of Representatives for a vote.
The bill will now be voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Associations such as the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) have been vocal in support of the bill. On June 10, the NADA and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the American International Automobile Dealers Association (AIADA), American Financial Services Association (AFSA), Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA), and the Recreation Vehicle Dealers Association (RVDA) sent a letter to the committee in support of the bill.
“The auto finance guidance pressures indirect auto finance companies (lenders who finance auto loans originated by dealers) to eliminate the ability of dealerships to discount the interest rates offered to customers who finance their auto purchase,” the letter read, in part. “The bureau embarked on this new policy, by its own subsequent admission to Congress, without first studying what impact these policy changes would have on the auto finance market, or the marginally creditworthy.”
More Compliance

Dueling Banjos in the Car Biz
Reports and accounts at variance show auto dealers’ trust profiles have risen in many consumers’ minds but that there remains a need for greater transparency by some.
Read More →
NADA and the Miracle on 34th Street
Automotive dealers should follow the National Automobile Dealers Association's consumer-friendly guidelines in order to minimize their legal risks.
Read More →
Another Look at a Recent Data Breach
Get caught up on the most pressing legal and regulatory matters facing dealers and F&I professionals, including data security, shotgun purchases, and inconsistent payment quotes.
Read More →

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems
Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.
Read More →
Fines of the Times
Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.
Read More →
Goodwill and Car Dealers
A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.
Read More →
The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back
President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law
Read More →
How to Clear a Red Flag
Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.
Read More →
