‘Best’ Is Not Always Best
AFIP’s executive director reminds us why the word “best” should be avoided when discussing financing or lease rates with customers.
Next to, “Did I get approved?” the second most common question customers ask is, “Is this the best rate available?” So how do you respond? I have a few recommendations, but let me first say that the word “best” cannot be used when discussing the installment sale finance charge or lease money factor with a customer.
What the F&I professional believes is the best rate and what a regulator, reporter or plaintiff’s attorney believes is the best rate are two entirely different things. To anyone outside the car business, the best rate is either the dealer’s buy rate or the lowest rate known to man. We believe it’s the buy rate plus “x” number of points. So any reference to the APR being the best rate available will be seen as a deceptive act on the part of the F&I practitioner.
Bear in mind, there is nothing illegal, unethical or immoral about a reasonable markup of the buy rate. The F&I practitioner, on behalf of a funding source, is competing with other funding options for the business, negotiating mutually acceptable terms, preparing the necessary documentation and conducting the required disclosures. As such, he or she should be fairly compensated for providing these services. Even the most rabid opponent of in-store funding will grudgingly concede this point; however, the practice somehow slides over to the dark side when the word “best” is used.
A greater effort might be mounted in defense of the practice if an acceptable solution wasn’t so readily available. The simple response to a “best rate” inquiry is, “If you wish to finance here, this is the rate that is available.” Nothing else should be added, because any further explanation will either create a legal liability or tip off the customer that there is something to be gained from pursuing the matter.
If the customer persists, the response should be, “Since I have no way of knowing what funding resources are available to you, I can’t make any judgment about what your best rate might be. You are free to explore your options, but if you wish to finance here, this is the rate that’s available.” The customer’s brother-in-law might be the local banker, so who knows at what rate he or she can borrow money.
As a quick caveat, stay away from discussions that tie, directly or by inference, the quoted APR to the customer’s credit history, because telling the customer the APR is based on his or her credit history is only partially true. Remember, the finance charge also includes the dealer markup at an amount based on the F&I person’s discretion.
So keep your responses simple and to the point, because any embellishments may imply that you are personally making a credit decision as it relates to the customer’s creditworthiness. In fact, adding a qualifier tagline like “and other factors” when discussing the quoted APR begs the question: What are the other factors? So, again, keep your response simple.
“If you wish to finance here, this is the APR (or money factor) that is available” does just what it is intended to do. It is to the point and free from any statement that would cause the customer not to seek a competitive comparison, as would be the case if the word “best” is used. The aforementioned statement satisfies both the legal and moral obligation to fully and accurately disclose the terms to car buyers who take advantage of the funding options you offer.
David Robertson is executive director of the Association of Finance and Insurance Professionals. Email him at david.robertson@bobit.com.
More Auto Finance

Dealerships Are Paying the Price for Extended Car Loans
Growing negative-equity scenarios mean such lengthy terms should be addressed in a forward-looking way to make them work for the dealer and the consumer down the road.
Read More →
Trade-Ins in Negative Equity Reach New Heights
As such trade-ins rise in frequency, so do monthly loan payment amounts and interest rates, according to second-quarter data compiled by Edmunds.
Read More →
Auto Credit Plentiful
June numbers show lenders are readily granting access, including to risky borrowers, as consumers leverage themselves to take on high prices.
Read More →
Automotive Consumers Sink Further in Debt
Most financing metrics hit records in the second quarter as more buyers locked themselves into long terms and high monthly payments.
Read More →
Porsche Financial Services Shifts Structure
After 36 years with Porsche, the Financial Services Chief Financial Officer Konrad Riedl is retiring, and the department is realigning its management structure.
Read More →
Tariffs Could Raise Insurance Premiums
As U.S. import tariffs affect repair costs, consumers might find it more affordable to replace a damaged vehicle, according to recent Insurify tariff analysis.
Read More →
Smaller Loans, Longer Terms
The youngest generation of car buyers is more likely to finance less expensive vehicles, more than half of generation Z consumers borrowing less than $25,000.
Read More →
New Cars a Tad More Affordable
May averages show that combined circumstances gave auto consumers slightly better buying power for the month, though average prices were up year-over-year.
Read More →
First-Quarter Sees Long Auto Loan Growth
Experian data show more consumers are tapping the method, along with refinancings, to afford buying. Meanwhile, subprime borrowers are getting more access.
Read More →
Mastering Credit Friction
In this video, Josh Krach explains how to turn credit friction into an advantage.
Read More →