April Incentives Decline for Most Brands
Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,654 per vehicle sold in April 2010, down $152, or 5.4 percent, from March 2010, and down $403, or 13.2 percent, from April 2009.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,654 per vehicle sold in April 2010, down $152, or 5.4 percent, from March 2010, and down $403, or 13.2 percent, from April 2009.
"Many incentives programs were continued from March into April and their effectiveness waned over time," stated Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. "The automakers that need extra marketing support will have to pull out a new trick for May.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,286 per vehicle sold in April 2010, down from $3,410 in March 2010. From March 2010 to April 2010, European automakers decreased incentives spending by $235 to $2,536 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers decreased incentives spending by $122 to $2,181 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers decreased incentives spending by $390 to $1,792 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Seven Automakers | |||
Automaker | April 2010 | March 2010 | April 2009 |
Chrysler Group | $3,374 | $3,300 | $4,383 |
Ford | $3,214 | $3,335 | $3,618 |
General Motors | $3,273 | $3,507 | $4,107 |
Honda | $1,787 * | $1,785 | $1,480 |
Hyundai | $1,792 | $2,182 | $3,427 |
Nissan | $2,451 | $2,394 | $2,767 |
Toyota | $2,498 | $2,743* | $1,634 |
Industry Average | $2,654 | $2,806 | $3,057 |
*Denotes a record
"Honda, Mini, Porsche and Toyota, who are traditionally very conservative in their offers, currently have incentives that are remarkably high for their individual brands," Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Michelle Krebs reported in AutoObserver.com. “Meanwhile, companies with momentum such as Ford, General Motors and Hyundai are able to cut back and let their products sell themselves.”
In April 2010, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $2.62 billion, down 12.3 percent from March 2010. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.4 billion, or 54.1 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $859 million, or 32.7 percent; European manufacturers spent $204 million, or 7.8 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $144 million, or 5.5 percent.
Among vehicle segments, large trucks had the highest average incentives, $4,471 per vehicle sold, followed by luxury car at $3,526. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $1,350, followed by sport cars at $1,428. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large trucks averaged the highest, 13.1 percent, followed by large cars at 11.2 percent of sticker price. Premium luxury cars averaged the lowest with 2.8 percent and premium sport cars followed with 3.6 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands, in April Scion spent the least, $406 followed by Subaru at $737 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Saab spent the most, $6,261, followed by HUMMER at $5,674 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Saab and smart spent the most, 15.9 percent and 15.2 percent of sticker price, respectively; while Scion spent 2.3 and Porsche spent 2.7 percent.
More F&I

How AI-Powered Coaching Is Transforming F&I Performance
See how AI-powered coaching can turn F&I customer conversations into actionable insights that support compliance, performance and profitability
Read More →
Sell Value, Build Trust
In this video, Trent White explains why selling on value, not fear, builds lasting customer trust, reduces cancellations, and drives long-term success.
Read More →
F&I Sales Give Dealers First-Half Lift
Product business shored up total profits to avoid an overall revenue tanking as product penetrations held steady, StoneEagle reported.
Read More →
Targeted Training Drives Results
Today’s technology, instead of threatening F&I managers, can actually make them better, according to an industry veteran who’s watched market setbacks roil the unprepared.
Read More →
Double the Change, Double the Chance
When an F&I manager gets a customer refusal, it’s a wise move to tweak more than one thing in the product offering.
Read More →
Just Do It
F&I managers need training, but instead of resisting application or expecting perfection, they should improve by simply acting on what they learn.
Read More →
Dealer Lender Preferences Revealed
When lenders provide consistent, fast service, their overall satisfaction scores with dealers greatly improve, according to JD Power research.
Read More →
Leading with Purpose
In this video, Trent White explains how understanding your people’s 'why' is a key leadership responsibility of F&I professionals and how that mindset drives dealership engagement, trust and performance.
Read More →
Integrating Nontraditional F&I Products
The niche presents a strategic advantage for auto dealerships as they move to adapt to fast-changing consumer expectations in today’s market.
Read More →
Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →