CFPB Sues Five Arizona Auto-Title Lenders
The bureau charged the title lenders with violating the Truth in Lending Act for failing to disclose annual percentage rates in online loan advertisements. It is seeking civil monetary penalties and administrative orders requiring the companies to correct their practices.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed individual lawsuits against five title lenders operating in Arizona for failing to disclose the annual percentage rate (APR) in online advertisements about auto-title loans. It is seeking civil monetary penalties and administrative orders requiring the companies to correct their practices.
Named in the suits were Auto Cash Leasing LLC, formed in 1999; Interstate Lending LLC, formed in 2005; Oasis Title Loans LLC, formed in 2013; Phoenix Title Loans LLC, formed in 2013; and Presto Auto Loans Inc., formed in 2002. All five lenders were formed in Arizona, operate in Arizona, and market their services to consumers online.
“From at least July 6, 2016, the CFPB alleges that the five lenders violated the Truth in Lending Act by advertising loan interest rates on their websites without advertising the corresponding annual percentage rate,” read the bureau’s announcement. “For example, one lender advertised on its website a monthly interest rate but failed to include the legally required annual percentage rate for the loan.”
The bureau said another lender asked consumers to take its advertised rate and multiple it by 12. However, it did not inform consumers that the calculated number is the annual percentage rate.
On Wednesday, the bureau filed a Notice of Charges that it had filed the lawsuits against the five title lenders. They will be tried by an administrative law judge from the bureau’s Office of Administrative Adjudication, an independent adjudicatory office within the bureau. The administrative law judge will hold hearings and make a recommended decision regarding the charges, and the director of the CFPB will issue a final decision, which may be appealed to a federal court.
More F&I

AI: Facilitator, Not Fixer, in F&I
The dealerships that thrive in the years ahead will be those that embrace technology while continuing to invest in the people who make customer interactions count.
Read More →
Modern Technology Objection Handling
In this video, Trent White shares how to confidently handle technology-based objections by helping customers understand the value of protection, even with modern vehicle technology.
Read More →
Consistency at Scale: Driving F&I Performance
With 75 rooftops across the Sunshine State, Morgan Auto Group has proven to Floridians that it knows a thing or two about driving performance in a competitive market. But it didn’t start at the top.
Read More →
Gitty Up on GAP
The foundational finance-and-insurance product hasn’t kept up with the latest conditions for auto dealers. Is the time ripe?
Read More →
How AI-Powered Coaching Is Transforming F&I Performance
See how AI-powered coaching can turn F&I customer conversations into actionable insights that support compliance, performance and profitability
Read More →
Sell Value, Build Trust
In this video, Trent White explains why selling on value, not fear, builds lasting customer trust, reduces cancellations, and drives long-term success.
Read More →
F&I Sales Give Dealers First-Half Lift
Product business shored up total profits to avoid an overall revenue tanking as product penetrations held steady, StoneEagle reported.
Read More →
Targeted Training Drives Results
Today’s technology, instead of threatening F&I managers, can actually make them better, according to an industry veteran who’s watched market setbacks roil the unprepared.
Read More →
Double the Change, Double the Chance
When an F&I manager gets a customer refusal, it’s a wise move to tweak more than one thing in the product offering.
Read More →
Just Do It
F&I managers need training, but instead of resisting application or expecting perfection, they should improve by simply acting on what they learn.
Read More →