Edmunds.com: Incentives Didn’t End in December
Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,530 per vehicle sold in January 2011, essentially unchanged from December 2010, but up $177, or 7.5 percent from January 2010.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,530 per vehicle sold in January 2011, essentially unchanged from December 2010, but up $177, or 7.5 percent from January 2010.
"January incentives were flat compared with December 2010, which means many car buyers didn’t actually have to rush to take advantage of heavily advertised ‘year-end’ deals," said Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. "Dealerships and automakers look to finish the year with strong sales numbers, and they’ve become very skilled at leading consumers to believe that the best deals are only available in December. It’s simply not true for most brands.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,371 per vehicle sold in January 2011, up from $3,325 in December 2010. From December to January, European automakers decreased incentives spending by $161 to $2,122 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers decreased incentives spending by $3 to $1,876 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers decreased incentives spending by $73 to $1,427 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Six Automakers | |||
Automaker | January 2011 | December 2010 | January 2010 |
Chrysler Group | $3,386 | $3,522 | $3,017 |
Ford | $2,859 | $3,304 | $3,073 |
General Motors | $3,762 | $3,255 | $2,910 |
Honda | $1,587 | $1,561 | $1,216 |
Nissan | $2,231 | $2,229 | $2,419 |
Toyota | $2,012 | $2,055 | $1,454 |
Industry Average | $2,530 | $2,538 | $2,353 |
In January 2011, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated at approximately $2.06 billion, down 28.6 percent from December 2010. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.2 billion, or 59.8 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $589 million, or 28.5 percent; European manufacturers spent $142 million, or 6.9 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $99 million, or 4.8 percent.
“General Motors’ incentive spend in January certainly raises some eyebrows,” said Caldwell. “GM spent more on incentives in January than any of their Big 6 rivals, even as they sold more 2011 model year vehicles. This suggests that their new model year vehicles are more heavily discounted than one might expect."
Among vehicle segments, large cars had the highest average incentives at $5,149 per vehicle sold, followed by large trucks at $3,661. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold at $1,298 followed by compact SUVs at $1,698. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large cars averaged the highest – 16.0 percent – followed by compact cars at 10.2 percent of sticker price. Premium sport cars averaged the lowest with 2.2 percent and premium luxury cars followed with 3.3 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands, Subaru spent the least in January 2011 at $548, followed by Porsche at $656 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Saab spent the most – $8,124 – followed by Cadillac at $5,641 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Saab and Chrysler spent the most, 19.9 percent and 15.6 percent of sticker price, respectively; while Porsche spent 0.75 percent and Subaru spent 2.1 percent.
More F&I

Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →
Amplify 2026 Billed as Turning Innovation Into Results
Reynolds and Reynolds says its annual retail summit will connect dealers with practical strategies, peer insight, and technology-driven ideas.
Read More →
Own Your Outcome: F&I in the Digital Customer Journey
Finance has historically been the last step in the car-buying process, but it doesn’t have to be. The customer’s journey starts long before they arrive at the dealership, and so should F&I’s involvement.
Read More →
Tariffs Could Raise Insurance Premiums
As U.S. import tariffs affect repair costs, consumers might find it more affordable to replace a damaged vehicle, according to recent Insurify tariff analysis.
Read More →
Smaller Loans, Longer Terms
The youngest generation of car buyers is more likely to finance less expensive vehicles, more than half of generation Z consumers borrowing less than $25,000.
Read More →
New Lifetime Battery F&I Product Meant to Drive Dealer Traffic
EFG Cos. offering is intended to create lifetime auto dealer engagement with customers.
Read More →
The Psychology Behind Menus That Increase Add-On Sales
There is a science to crafting a menu that gives customers confidence in the choices presented, and moving the process outside the F&I office can further boost results.
Read More →
Why Your F&I PVR Is Misleading You
Here’s a handy checklist of the numbers to track in 2026 instead.
Read More →
Auto Consumer Anxiety Presents Opportunity
A survey of U.S. drivers found the majority are concerned about finances and the economy, but those fears make many ready to buy vehicle-protection products.
Read More →
Humble and Hungry: 12 Rules for an F&I Life
Dustin Gingerich, with a decade in the F&I business under his belt, shares his thoughts on leadership, building trust with customers, and the importance of learning and innovation.
Read More →