Edmunds.com: Incentives Didn’t End in December
Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,530 per vehicle sold in January 2011, essentially unchanged from December 2010, but up $177, or 7.5 percent from January 2010.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,530 per vehicle sold in January 2011, essentially unchanged from December 2010, but up $177, or 7.5 percent from January 2010.
"January incentives were flat compared with December 2010, which means many car buyers didn’t actually have to rush to take advantage of heavily advertised ‘year-end’ deals," said Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. "Dealerships and automakers look to finish the year with strong sales numbers, and they’ve become very skilled at leading consumers to believe that the best deals are only available in December. It’s simply not true for most brands.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,371 per vehicle sold in January 2011, up from $3,325 in December 2010. From December to January, European automakers decreased incentives spending by $161 to $2,122 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers decreased incentives spending by $3 to $1,876 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers decreased incentives spending by $73 to $1,427 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Six Automakers | |||
Automaker | January 2011 | December 2010 | January 2010 |
Chrysler Group | $3,386 | $3,522 | $3,017 |
Ford | $2,859 | $3,304 | $3,073 |
General Motors | $3,762 | $3,255 | $2,910 |
Honda | $1,587 | $1,561 | $1,216 |
Nissan | $2,231 | $2,229 | $2,419 |
Toyota | $2,012 | $2,055 | $1,454 |
Industry Average | $2,530 | $2,538 | $2,353 |
In January 2011, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated at approximately $2.06 billion, down 28.6 percent from December 2010. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.2 billion, or 59.8 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $589 million, or 28.5 percent; European manufacturers spent $142 million, or 6.9 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $99 million, or 4.8 percent.
“General Motors’ incentive spend in January certainly raises some eyebrows,” said Caldwell. “GM spent more on incentives in January than any of their Big 6 rivals, even as they sold more 2011 model year vehicles. This suggests that their new model year vehicles are more heavily discounted than one might expect."
Among vehicle segments, large cars had the highest average incentives at $5,149 per vehicle sold, followed by large trucks at $3,661. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold at $1,298 followed by compact SUVs at $1,698. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large cars averaged the highest – 16.0 percent – followed by compact cars at 10.2 percent of sticker price. Premium sport cars averaged the lowest with 2.2 percent and premium luxury cars followed with 3.3 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands, Subaru spent the least in January 2011 at $548, followed by Porsche at $656 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Saab spent the most – $8,124 – followed by Cadillac at $5,641 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Saab and Chrysler spent the most, 19.9 percent and 15.6 percent of sticker price, respectively; while Porsche spent 0.75 percent and Subaru spent 2.1 percent.
More F&I

Why Your F&I PVR Is Misleading You
Here’s a handy checklist of the numbers to track in 2026 instead.
Read More →
Auto Consumer Anxiety Presents Opportunity
A survey of U.S. drivers found the majority are concerned about finances and the economy, but those fears make many ready to buy vehicle-protection products.
Read More →
Humble and Hungry: 12 Rules for an F&I Life
Dustin Gingerich, with a decade in the F&I business under his belt, shares his thoughts on leadership, building trust with customers, and the importance of learning and innovation.
Read More →
Focus on the Opening
F&I managers must learn as much as possible about their customers, starting before they walk into their offices. The bulk of today’s consumers expect that, and good results will follow.
Read More →
F&I Reaches for the Sky
The increasingly important profit center continued making gains in the first quarter, according to StoneEagle data, ancillary products proving more popular as consumers hold onto their buys longer.
Read More →
Timing the Market Can Hurt Long-Term Program Performance
For dealer-owned reinsurance entities, avoiding volatility entirely can mean falling behind inflation and missing market rebounds that drive long term surplus growth. Missing just a handful of strong market days can materially impact cumulative returns—an important reminder for long horizon trust and investment strategies.
Read More →
The 90/10 Rule
In this video, Ryan Ruff explains the rule that elite sales professionals use to turn ordinary conversations into unforgettable customer experiences.
Read More →
Your Office Is Talking
What’s the atmosphere saying about you to your customers? You can make minor adjustments and additions that transform your space into one that creates trust with the people on the other side of the desk.
Read More →
F&I Training Fundamentals
How can auto dealerships help F&I managers fulfill their vital role in the most effective ways? Industry expert Rick McCormick shares his insights on the best ways to train these professionals and help them maintain good habits.
Read More →
Not Just Any Tire Will Do
More consumers and businesses are opting for all-season options for various reasons as safety, sustainability and convenience push practical change.
Read More →