Incentives Decline in October, Says Edmunds.com
Edmunds.com estimated today that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the United States was $2,468 per vehicle sold in October 2009, down $329, or 11.8 percent, from September 2009, and down $209, or 7.8 percent, from October 2008.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated today that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the United States was $2,468 per vehicle sold in October 2009, down $329, or 11.8 percent, from September 2009, and down $209, or 7.8 percent, from October 2008.
"Incentives declined simply because fewer old model year vehicles were sold in October, and the newer vehicles are not discounted nearly as heavily," explained Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. "Over 55 percent of vehicles sold in October were 2010 model year, compared with about 36 percent in September.”
Model Year | Percentage of October 2009 Sales | Percentage of September 2009 Sales | True Cost of Incentives in October 2009 | True Cost of Incentives in September 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 1.7% | 1.9% | $ 3,439 | $ 3,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 42.6% | 61.5% | $ 3,595 | $ 3,388 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 55.7% | 36.7% | $ 1,569 | $ 1,651 |
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,655 per vehicle sold in October 2009, down from $3,880 in September 2009. From September 2009 to October 2009, European automakers decreased incentives spending by $635 to $2,686 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers decreased incentives spending by $363 to $1,258 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers decreased incentives spending by $301 to $1,751 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Seven Automakers | |||
Automaker | October | September | October |
Chrysler Group | $3,219 | $4,224 | $3,695 |
Ford | $2,909 | $3,087 | $3,886 |
General Motors | $4,277 | $4,316 | $3,668 |
Honda | $508 | $929 | $1,049 |
Hyundai | $1,751 | $2,052 | $2,528 |
Nissan | $2,505 | $2,982 | $1,795 |
Toyota | $1,338 | $1,515 | $1,576 |
Industry Average | $2,468 | $2,797 | $2,677 |
In October 2009, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $2.04 billion, down 1.9 percent from September 2009. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.3 billion, or 64.9 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $418 million, or 20.3 percent; European manufacturers spent $215 million, or 10.5 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $87 million, or 4.3 percent.
"Many automakers deemed October ‘truck month’ and sure enough, the large truck segment reached a new incentive peak for the year, climbing to over $5,000 per truck,” Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Michelle Krebs wrote on AutoObserver.com. “Truck month’ provided a good value for buyers who weren’t deterred by rising gas prices.”
Among vehicle segments, premium sport cars had the highest average incentives, $8,826 per vehicle sold, followed by premium luxury cars at $6,395. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $928, followed by compact cars at $1,354. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large trucks averaged the highest, 14.8 percent, followed by large cars at 12.6 percent of sticker price. Sport cars averaged the lowest with 5.3 percent and minivans followed with 5.4 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands, in October MINI spent $58 followed by Subaru at $262 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Cadillac spent the most, $7,398, followed by HUMMER at $6,051 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Pontiac and Cadillac spent the most, 19.2 percent and 15.1 percent of sticker price, respectively; while MINI spent 0.3 and Subaru spent 1.0 percent.
More F&I

AI: Facilitator, Not Fixer, in F&I
The dealerships that thrive in the years ahead will be those that embrace technology while continuing to invest in the people who make customer interactions count.
Read More →
Modern Technology Objection Handling
In this video, Trent White shares how to confidently handle technology-based objections by helping customers understand the value of protection, even with modern vehicle technology.
Read More →
Consistency at Scale: Driving F&I Performance
With 75 rooftops across the Sunshine State, Morgan Auto Group has proven to Floridians that it knows a thing or two about driving performance in a competitive market. But it didn’t start at the top.
Read More →
Gitty Up on GAP
The foundational finance-and-insurance product hasn’t kept up with the latest conditions for auto dealers. Is the time ripe?
Read More →
How AI-Powered Coaching Is Transforming F&I Performance
See how AI-powered coaching can turn F&I customer conversations into actionable insights that support compliance, performance and profitability
Read More →
Sell Value, Build Trust
In this video, Trent White explains why selling on value, not fear, builds lasting customer trust, reduces cancellations, and drives long-term success.
Read More →
F&I Sales Give Dealers First-Half Lift
Product business shored up total profits to avoid an overall revenue tanking as product penetrations held steady, StoneEagle reported.
Read More →
Targeted Training Drives Results
Today’s technology, instead of threatening F&I managers, can actually make them better, according to an industry veteran who’s watched market setbacks roil the unprepared.
Read More →
Double the Change, Double the Chance
When an F&I manager gets a customer refusal, it’s a wise move to tweak more than one thing in the product offering.
Read More →
Just Do It
F&I managers need training, but instead of resisting application or expecting perfection, they should improve by simply acting on what they learn.
Read More →