NADA Study Shows Decrease in Satisfaction With Dealer System Providers
New research from the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA)’s Information Technology Committee shows that dealership satisfaction with dealer system provider (DSP) vendors declined significantly from the 2007 survey.
McLEAN, Va. — New research from the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA)’s Information Technology Committee shows that dealership satisfaction with dealer system provider (DSP) vendors declined significantly from the 2007 survey.
DSP vendors develop and support dealership computer systems that assist dealers in managing their operations.
The 2009 survey, conducted for NADA by the automotive marketing research firm Friedman-Swift Associates in Cincinnati, Ohio, shows that only 72 percent of dealership personnel are satisfied overall with their DSP vendors in 2009 compared to 79 percent in 2007. Fifty-three percent of dealership personnel in 2009 would recommend their DSP vendor to another dealership, slightly less than the 55 percent that said they would recommend their DSP vendor in 2007.
“Even though the overall satisfaction of the DSP vendors decreased from the 2007 survey, some vendors did show improvement,” said Jim Waldron, owner of Jim Waldron Buick-Pontiac-GMC Truck in Davison, Mich. and chairman of NADA’s IT committee.
“The vendors indicated they had planned to address topics in the 2007 survey that received low satisfaction ratings, but the overall results show that as a group they were not successful in improving overall dealership satisfaction, system functionality, customer service or training,” Waldron added. “We hope they will work diligently in coming months to improve their products and services for dealers.”
The survey shows that dealership satisfaction with DSP vendors is driven mainly by:
• System Functionality – Key functionality drivers include flexibility of system software to adapt to dealerships’ business needs and the ability to customize the software for dealership needs.
• Customer Service – Key service drivers include satisfaction with overall customer service and the speed of getting changes and modifications made.
• Third Party Vendors – Key integration driver includes satisfaction with the ability of the system to allow third party vendors to share information.
• Training – A key training driver includes effectiveness of technical training.
“The survey highlights areas that are important to dealers and where there are opportunities for the DSP vendors to improve,” said Dick Malaise, NADA vice president and chief information officer.
To view the complete survey, click here.
More F&I

AI: Facilitator, Not Fixer, in F&I
The dealerships that thrive in the years ahead will be those that embrace technology while continuing to invest in the people who make customer interactions count.
Read More →
Modern Technology Objection Handling
In this video, Trent White shares how to confidently handle technology-based objections by helping customers understand the value of protection, even with modern vehicle technology.
Read More →
Consistency at Scale: Driving F&I Performance
With 75 rooftops across the Sunshine State, Morgan Auto Group has proven to Floridians that it knows a thing or two about driving performance in a competitive market. But it didn’t start at the top.
Read More →
Gitty Up on GAP
The foundational finance-and-insurance product hasn’t kept up with the latest conditions for auto dealers. Is the time ripe?
Read More →
How AI-Powered Coaching Is Transforming F&I Performance
See how AI-powered coaching can turn F&I customer conversations into actionable insights that support compliance, performance and profitability
Read More →
Sell Value, Build Trust
In this video, Trent White explains why selling on value, not fear, builds lasting customer trust, reduces cancellations, and drives long-term success.
Read More →
F&I Sales Give Dealers First-Half Lift
Product business shored up total profits to avoid an overall revenue tanking as product penetrations held steady, StoneEagle reported.
Read More →
Targeted Training Drives Results
Today’s technology, instead of threatening F&I managers, can actually make them better, according to an industry veteran who’s watched market setbacks roil the unprepared.
Read More →
Double the Change, Double the Chance
When an F&I manager gets a customer refusal, it’s a wise move to tweak more than one thing in the product offering.
Read More →
Just Do It
F&I managers need training, but instead of resisting application or expecting perfection, they should improve by simply acting on what they learn.
Read More →