Toyota Recall Incentives Make Small Dent in January
Edmunds.com estimated today that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,382 per vehicle sold in January 2010, down $160, or 6.3 percent, from December 2009, and down $326, or 12.0 percent, from January 2009.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated today that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,382 per vehicle sold in January 2010, down $160, or 6.3 percent, from December 2009, and down $326, or 12.0 percent, from January 2009.
"January incentives were not particularly generous or compelling — until some automakers began trying to conquest unsettled Toyota owners and shoppers late in the month," stated Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. "January sales numbers are up from last year only because of fleet sales.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,108 per vehicle sold in January 2010, down from $3,399 in December 2009. From December 2009 to January 2010, European automakers decreased incentives spending by $363 to $2,611 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers decreased incentives spending by $1 to $1,563 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers increased incentives spending by $69 to $2,096 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Seven Automakers | |||
Automaker | January 2010 | December 2009 | January 2009 |
Chrysler | $3,061 | $2,567 | $4,291 |
Ford | $3,095 | $3,040 | $3,505 |
General Motors | $3,103 | $4,001 | $3,138 |
Honda | $1,203 | $1,253 | $1,374 |
Hyundai | $2,096 | $2,027 | $3,071 |
Nissan | $2,455 | $2,157 | $2,153 |
Toyota | $1,550 | $1,665 | $1,994 |
Industry Average | $2,382 | $2,542 | $2,708 |
In January 2010, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $1.67 billion, down 35.9 percent from December 2009. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.0 billion, or 60.2 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $424 million, or 25.1 percent; European manufacturers spent $149 million, or 8.9 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $96 million, or 5.8 percent.
"February could prove interesting. We’ll see the usual President’s Day sales and, in addition, we could see some deals from Toyota as it tries to lure weary shoppers back to its showrooms after its recalls and sales stoppage. And Toyota competitors won’t stand still for that. As they demonstrated in January, they’ll do what they can to capitalize on Toyota’s weakened state," reported Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Michelle Krebs in her report on AutoObserver.com.
Among vehicle segments, large trucks had the highest average incentives, $3,743 per vehicle sold, followed by large SUV at $3,724. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $1,116, followed by sport cars at $1,250. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large trucks averaged the highest, 11.0 percent, followed by large cars at 9.6 percent of sticker price. Premium sport cars averaged the lowest with 3.2 percent and premium luxury cars followed with 3.7 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands, in January MINI spent the least, $226 followed by Scion at $320 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, HUMMER spent the most, $5,733, followed by Lincoln at $5,484 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Saturn and HUMMER spent the most, 18.4 percent and 15.2 percent of sticker price, respectively; while MINI spent 1.0 and Scion spent 1.9 percent.
More F&I

Integrating Nontraditional F&I Products
The niche presents a strategic advantage for auto dealerships as they move to adapt to fast-changing consumer expectations in today’s market.
Read More →
Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →
Amplify 2026 Billed as Turning Innovation Into Results
Reynolds and Reynolds says its annual retail summit will connect dealers with practical strategies, peer insight, and technology-driven ideas.
Read More →
Own Your Outcome: F&I in the Digital Customer Journey
Finance has historically been the last step in the car-buying process, but it doesn’t have to be. The customer’s journey starts long before they arrive at the dealership, and so should F&I’s involvement.
Read More →
Tariffs Could Raise Insurance Premiums
As U.S. import tariffs affect repair costs, consumers might find it more affordable to replace a damaged vehicle, according to recent Insurify tariff analysis.
Read More →
Smaller Loans, Longer Terms
The youngest generation of car buyers is more likely to finance less expensive vehicles, more than half of generation Z consumers borrowing less than $25,000.
Read More →
New Lifetime Battery F&I Product Meant to Drive Dealer Traffic
EFG Cos. offering is intended to create lifetime auto dealer engagement with customers.
Read More →
The Psychology Behind Menus That Increase Add-On Sales
There is a science to crafting a menu that gives customers confidence in the choices presented, and moving the process outside the F&I office can further boost results.
Read More →
Why Your F&I PVR Is Misleading You
Here’s a handy checklist of the numbers to track in 2026 instead.
Read More →
Auto Consumer Anxiety Presents Opportunity
A survey of U.S. drivers found the majority are concerned about finances and the economy, but those fears make many ready to buy vehicle-protection products.
Read More →