Automatic Braking Systems Not Surefire
AAA crash tests show they don’t do the job in every scenario.

AAA says backing drivers should also use backup cameras and other sensors, exercising particular caution when their view is blocked.
IMAGE: Pexels/Karolina Grabowska
Tests by AAA show that reverse automatic emergency braking shouldn’t be a driver’s only cautionary measure when backing up.
The motor club group conducted crash tests with four small- to medium-size 2023 sports-utility vehicle models featuring the braking technology with rear cross-traffic mitigation, which is designed to mitigate or prevent collisions with other vehicles, some systems also detecting other obstacles. It chose SUVs due to that vehicle type’s popularity.
The AAA tests examined how the systems operate in two scenarios: when a vehicle backs out of a parking space into an oncoming vehicle’s path as an adjacent parked vehicle blocks the driver’s seat view, and with a child pedestrian standing behind the backing vehicle.
The research found that the technology applied the brakes in 65% of tests and prevented a collision in just 2.5% of tests involving a crossing vehicle. In the tests involving a stationary child behind the backing vehicle, it applied the brakes 75% of the time and prevented collision in half the tests.
Test models were from the Hyundai, Lexus, Mazda and Volkswagen lines.
Based on the results, AAA concluded that drivers shouldn’t solely rely on AEB systems when backing, instead also using backup cameras and other sensors, exercising particular caution when their view is blocked to give the AEB system more time to detect obstacles and brake. It also advised vehicle owners to ensure the technology is in good working condition.
AAA said U.S. testing standards for the technology are “lacking” and urged that more be done to ensure they work as intended.
Originally posted on Auto Dealer Today
More F&I

Modern Technology Objection Handling
In this video, Trent White shares how to confidently handle technology-based objections by helping customers understand the value of protection, even with modern vehicle technology.
Read More →
Consistency at Scale: Driving F&I Performance
With 75 rooftops across the Sunshine State, Morgan Auto Group has proven to Floridians that it knows a thing or two about driving performance in a competitive market. But it didn’t start at the top.
Read More →
Gitty Up on GAP
The foundational finance-and-insurance product hasn’t kept up with the latest conditions for auto dealers. Is the time ripe?
Read More →
How AI-Powered Coaching Is Transforming F&I Performance
See how AI-powered coaching can turn F&I customer conversations into actionable insights that support compliance, performance and profitability
Read More →
Sell Value, Build Trust
In this video, Trent White explains why selling on value, not fear, builds lasting customer trust, reduces cancellations, and drives long-term success.
Read More →
F&I Sales Give Dealers First-Half Lift
Product business shored up total profits to avoid an overall revenue tanking as product penetrations held steady, StoneEagle reported.
Read More →
Targeted Training Drives Results
Today’s technology, instead of threatening F&I managers, can actually make them better, according to an industry veteran who’s watched market setbacks roil the unprepared.
Read More →
Double the Change, Double the Chance
When an F&I manager gets a customer refusal, it’s a wise move to tweak more than one thing in the product offering.
Read More →
Just Do It
F&I managers need training, but instead of resisting application or expecting perfection, they should improve by simply acting on what they learn.
Read More →
Dealer Lender Preferences Revealed
When lenders provide consistent, fast service, their overall satisfaction scores with dealers greatly improve, according to JD Power research.
Read More →