FI showroom red and grey logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

CFPB Fines SNAAC for Violating 2015 Consent Order

Security National Automotive Acceptance Co. agreed to pay $1.25 million to settle the bureau's charges that it failed to pay $2.275 million in consumer redress for illegal debt-collection tactics under the regulator's October 2015 order. But the company did so without admitting to the CFPB's finding, company officials said.

by Staff
April 26, 2017
CFPB Fines SNAAC for Violating 2015 Consent Order

 

4 min to read


WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) took action this week against Security National Automotive Acceptance Co. (SNAAC) for violating its October 2015 consent order, which ordered the auto finance source to pay both redress and a civil penalty for illegal debt-collection tactics.

According to the bureau's April 27 announcement, SNACC violated the 2015 order by failing to provide more than $1 million in refunds and credits to more than 1,000 consumers. Today’s consent order requires SNAAC to make good on the redress it owes and pay an additional $1.25 million penalty.

Ad Loading...

“The company violated a bureau order when it failed to get money back to servicemembers it has hounded with illegal debt-collection tactics,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “We are making sure this company finally rights its wrong.”

In an emailed statement to F&I and Showroom, SNAAC said the settlement resolves a disagreement between the finance company and the bureau over the intepretation of part of the 2015 order. "SNAAC agreed to this settlement to close the matter and move forward in serving customers in the respectful, honorable manner that has been the company's tradition," read the statement, in part. "The CFPB acknowledges in the settlement agreement that SNAAC has consented to the order 'without admitting" to its findings."

Based in Mason, Ohio, SNAAC operates in more than two dozen states and specializes in loans to servicemembers, primarily to buy used vehicles. In June 2015, the bureau sued the finance source for aggressive collection tactics against consumers. If servicemembers fell behind on payments, the bureau charged, SNAAC’s collectors would threaten to contact — and in many cases did — their chain of command about their debts. The bureau also said the company exaggerated the consequences of not paying, such as telling servicemembers that failure to pay could result in action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, demotion, discharge, or loss of security clearance.

In October of that year, the CFPB issued a consent order against the finance source for engaging in unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices while collecting on auto loans. The order required SNAAC to pay $2.275 million in consumer redress through credits and refunds and a $1 million civil penalty. Consumers with a balance with SNAAC were to receive account credits, while consumers with a zero balance were to receive cash refunds. SNAAC submitted two plans to meet its obligations under the consent order, but both plans, the bureau now charges, were designed to underpay the redress.

According to today’s announcement, the bureau, acting on a tip from a servicemember’s father, discovered that the finance source had issued “worthless credits to hundreds of consumers and failed to provide proper redress to many more.”

Ad Loading...

In today’s order, the CFPB claimed SNAAC issued credits on settled-in-full accounts, treating those accounts as having a positive account balance even though servicemembers could not use those credits toward any new or existing loan. It also charges the finance company with issuing credits to consumers whose debts had already been discharged in bankruptcy. It also alleges the company failed to properly give redress to consumers making payments under settlement agreements. In many instances, the bureau noted, SNAAC issued credits that exceeded consumers’ settlement balances rather than refund any amount above what the consumers actually owed. That resulted in some consumers unwittingly overpaying SNAAC to settle their accounts.

The CFPB has now ordered SNAAC to pay redress as promised to affected consumers, which amounts to about $720,000. It must also issue about $370,000 in new credits to more than 1,000 consumers with remaining account balances as well as properly credit about 1,000 consumers making payments under settlement agreements. The finance source must also pay $75,000 to the bureau to cover costs of distributing these payments.

The $1.25 million fine SNAAC must also pay to the CFPB Civil Penalty Fund is in addition to the $1 million penalty it paid under the 2015 consent order.

In its emailed statement, the finance company noted that the original consent order covered approximately 2,200 of the more than 83,000 accounts serviced by SNAAC between 2011 and 2015. It's issue with the bureau, the company said, was the application of credits provided to a fraction of those accounts that had already "benefited from a settlement balance for substantially less than was owed."

"Although SNAAC disagreed with the CFPB's interpretation of the 2015 consent order, the company offered to pay all the disputed amounts in order to move forward," the company said. "The CFPB declined the offer and began an inquiry. SNAAC fully cooperated and responded quickly to all requests for data, reports and testimony."


More F&I

Photo of a three-seat vehicle back seat
F&Iby Hannah MitchellMay 22, 2026

F&I Reaches for the Sky

The increasingly important profit center continued making gains in the first quarter, according to StoneEagle data, ancillary products proving more popular as consumers hold onto their buys longer.

Read More →
Cover image for a BOK Financial report titled “Timing the market: How avoiding volatility entirely can hurt long-term reinsurance program performance.” The image shows several road construction barricades with flashing amber warning lights lined up in a nighttime work zone. Beneath the image, red text explains that avoiding volatility can mean falling behind inflation and missing market rebounds that drive long-term surplus growth. The BOK Financial logo appears at the bottom right.
SponsoredMay 8, 2026

Timing the Market Can Hurt Long-Term Program Performance

For dealer-owned reinsurance entities, avoiding volatility entirely can mean falling behind inflation and missing market rebounds that drive long term surplus growth. Missing just a handful of strong market days can materially impact cumulative returns—an important reminder for long horizon trust and investment strategies.

Read More →
Ryan Ruff, The 90/10 Rule, Automotive Training Academy, Sales Series
F&IMay 6, 2026

The 90/10 Rule

In this video, Ryan Ruff explains the rule that elite sales professionals use to turn ordinary conversations into unforgettable customer experiences.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Photo of essential oil diffuser on desk next to laptop
F&IMay 4, 2026

Your Office Is Talking

What’s the atmosphere saying about you to your customers? You can make minor adjustments and additions that transform your space into one that creates trust with the people on the other side of the desk.

Read More →
"Effective training ensures the customer’s needs remain at the heart of everything we do. When that is the focus, both sales and profits naturally improve." by Rick McCormick with F&I and Showroom logo and picture of Rick McCormick
F&IMay 1, 2026

F&I Training Fundamentals

How can auto dealerships help F&I managers fulfill their vital role in the most effective ways? Industry expert Rick McCormick shares his insights on the best ways to train these professionals and help them maintain good habits.

Read More →
Photo of car tire and the tread mark it left in snow
F&Iby Hannah MitchellApril 29, 2026

Not Just Any Tire Will Do

More consumers and businesses are opting for all-season options for various reasons as safety, sustainability and convenience push practical change.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Photo of robot holding a laptop
F&Iby Hannah MitchellApril 27, 2026

How AI Will Drive the Next Wave of Innovation in Finance & Insurance

It’s time to take the next digital step to free F&I managers to handle the most challenging aspects of customer meetings.

Read More →
Photo of notepad and pen next to computer keyboard on desktop
F&IApril 13, 2026

Control in Sales Is an Illusion

Some of it should be given to the customer, but that doesn’t mean the F&I office relinquishes the process. In fact, a different approach both builds trust and boosts sales.

Read More →
Photo of external keyboard on office deak next to window
F&IApril 7, 2026

The Limited Warranty Game

Bringing it in-house benefits the dealership and its customers.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Woman in casual clothing sitting at a desk
F&Iby Rick McCormickMarch 31, 2026

Curb The Confusion

Talk to F&I customers like you’d talk to a friend, without industry lingo or sales-like questions, and use hard proof to show, not tell, them about a need.

Read More →