Incentive Spending Increases as Automakers Entice Toyota Customers
Edmunds.com estimated that the average automaker incentive in the United States was $2,588 per vehicle sold in February 2010, up $248, or 10.6 percent, from January 2010, but down $422, or 14.0 percent, from February 2009.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated that the average automaker incentive in the United States was $2,588 per vehicle sold in February 2010, up $248, or 10.6 percent, from January 2010, but down $422, or 14.0 percent, from February 2009.
“Incentive spending went up last month for most major automakers as they tried to lure Toyota buyers to their brand,” stated Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. “Toyota needs to stay competitive in this area while rebuilding confidence in their vehicles.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,394 per vehicle sold in February 2010, up from $2,968 in January 2010. From January 2010 to February 2010, European automakers increased incentives spending by $12 to $2,494 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers increased incentives spending by $270 to $1,853 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers decreased incentives spending by $630 to $1,676 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Seven Automakers | |||
Automaker | February 2010 | January 2010 | February 2009 |
Chrysler Group | $3,388 | $3,008 | $5,608* |
Ford | $3,301 | $3,039 | $3,384 |
General Motors | $3,434 | $2,885 | $3,681 |
Honda | $1,406 | $1,212 | $1,249 |
Hyundai | $1,676 | $2,306 | $3,367 |
Nissan | $2,602 | $2,424 | $2,572 |
Toyota | $1,833 | $1,452 | $1,682 |
Industry Average | $2,588 | $2,340 | $3,010 |
*Denotes a record
In February 2010, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $2.03 billion, up 24.8 percent from January 2010. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.2 billion, or 58 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $571 million, or 28.3 percent; European manufacturers spent $165 million, or 8.2 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $110 million, or 5.5 percent.
“February was the first time since August 1998 that Ford outsold General Motors,” reported Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Michelle Krebs in her report on AutoObserver.com. “Ford has a lot of momentum right now, while GM has essentially stopped selling four of its brands.”
Among vehicle segments, large trucks had the highest average incentives, $4,194 per vehicle sold, followed by premium luxury car at $4,023. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $1,205, followed by sport cars at $1,394. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large trucks averaged the highest, 12.4 percent, followed by large cars at 11.4 percent of sticker price. Premium sport cars averaged the lowest with 1.7 percent and sport cars followed with 4.2 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands, in February smart spent the least, $341 followed by Scion at $426 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Lincoln spent the most, $5,568, followed by HUMMER at $5,195 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Saturn and HUMMER spent the most, 14.9 percent and 13.6 percent of sticker price, respectively; while Porsche spent 1.4 and smart spent 2.3 percent.
More F&I

Integrating Nontraditional F&I Products
The niche presents a strategic advantage for auto dealerships as they move to adapt to fast-changing consumer expectations in today’s market.
Read More →
Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →
Amplify 2026 Billed as Turning Innovation Into Results
Reynolds and Reynolds says its annual retail summit will connect dealers with practical strategies, peer insight, and technology-driven ideas.
Read More →
Own Your Outcome: F&I in the Digital Customer Journey
Finance has historically been the last step in the car-buying process, but it doesn’t have to be. The customer’s journey starts long before they arrive at the dealership, and so should F&I’s involvement.
Read More →
Tariffs Could Raise Insurance Premiums
As U.S. import tariffs affect repair costs, consumers might find it more affordable to replace a damaged vehicle, according to recent Insurify tariff analysis.
Read More →
Smaller Loans, Longer Terms
The youngest generation of car buyers is more likely to finance less expensive vehicles, more than half of generation Z consumers borrowing less than $25,000.
Read More →
New Lifetime Battery F&I Product Meant to Drive Dealer Traffic
EFG Cos. offering is intended to create lifetime auto dealer engagement with customers.
Read More →
The Psychology Behind Menus That Increase Add-On Sales
There is a science to crafting a menu that gives customers confidence in the choices presented, and moving the process outside the F&I office can further boost results.
Read More →
Why Your F&I PVR Is Misleading You
Here’s a handy checklist of the numbers to track in 2026 instead.
Read More →
Auto Consumer Anxiety Presents Opportunity
A survey of U.S. drivers found the majority are concerned about finances and the economy, but those fears make many ready to buy vehicle-protection products.
Read More →