Manufacturer Incentives Increase in March
Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,742 per vehicle sold in March 2010, up $100, or 3.8 percent, from February 2010, but down $423, or 13.4 percent, from March 2009.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,742 per vehicle sold in March 2010, up $100, or 3.8 percent, from February 2010, but down $423, or 13.4 percent, from March 2009.
“Incentives helped lift sales to its highest level since Cash for Clunkers,” stated Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. “And this month will be the highest ever for average combined incentive spending for Japanese automakers, including a record high month for Toyota.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,413 per vehicle sold in March 2010, down from $3,463 in February 2010. From February 2010 to March 2010, European automakers increased incentives spending by $151 to $2,763 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers increased incentives spending by $224 to $2,058 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers increased incentives spending by $349 to $1,997 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Seven Automakers | |||
Automaker | March 2010 | February 2010 | March 2009 |
Chrysler Group | $ 3,359 | $ 3,618 | $ 4,889 |
Ford | $ 3,304 | $ 3,288 | $ 3,673 |
General Motors | $ 3,519 | $ 3,509 | $ 4,772* |
Honda | $ 1,740 | $ 1,420 | $ 1,334 |
Hyundai | $ 1,997 | $ 1,648 | $ 3,504* |
Nissan | $ 2,403 | $ 2,471 | $ 2,234 |
Toyota | $ 2,256* | $ 1,881 | $ 1,565 |
Industry Average | $ 2,742 | $ 2,642 | $ 3,165* |
*Denotes a record high | |||
In March 2010, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $3.07 billion, up 49.4 percent from February 2010. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.7 billion, or 54.8 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $922 million, or 30.5 percent; European manufacturers spent $262 million, or 8.7 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $183 million, or 6.1 percent.
“April is typically a slower sales month than March, and we’re already getting signals that some automakers will extend their incentives,” continued Caldwell. “The question is will they be effective. The trend we saw in March was that incentives were very effective early in the month but far less so by month’s end.”
Among vehicle segments, large trucks had the highest average incentives, $4,290 per vehicle sold, followed by large SUVs at $3,843. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $1,294, followed by sport cars at $1,416. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large trucks averaged the highest, 12.6 percent, followed by large cars at 11.9 percent of sticker price. Premium sport cars averaged the lowest with 2.7 percent and sport cars followed with 4.4 percent of sticker price.
Comparing all brands in March, Scion spent the least at $333, followed by MINI at $697 per vehicle sold. At the other end of the spectrum, Lincoln spent the most at $5,205, followed by BMW at $4,794 per vehicle sold. Relative to their vehicle prices, Saturn and Chrysler spent the most, 15.0 percent and 13.7 percent of sticker price, respectively; while Porsche spent 1.3 and Scion spent 1.9 percent.
More F&I

How AI-Powered Coaching Is Transforming F&I Performance
See how AI-powered coaching can turn F&I customer conversations into actionable insights that support compliance, performance and profitability
Read More →
Sell Value, Build Trust
In this video, Trent White explains why selling on value, not fear, builds lasting customer trust, reduces cancellations, and drives long-term success.
Read More →
F&I Sales Give Dealers First-Half Lift
Product business shored up total profits to avoid an overall revenue tanking as product penetrations held steady, StoneEagle reported.
Read More →
Targeted Training Drives Results
Today’s technology, instead of threatening F&I managers, can actually make them better, according to an industry veteran who’s watched market setbacks roil the unprepared.
Read More →
Double the Change, Double the Chance
When an F&I manager gets a customer refusal, it’s a wise move to tweak more than one thing in the product offering.
Read More →
Just Do It
F&I managers need training, but instead of resisting application or expecting perfection, they should improve by simply acting on what they learn.
Read More →
Dealer Lender Preferences Revealed
When lenders provide consistent, fast service, their overall satisfaction scores with dealers greatly improve, according to JD Power research.
Read More →
Leading with Purpose
In this video, Trent White explains how understanding your people’s 'why' is a key leadership responsibility of F&I professionals and how that mindset drives dealership engagement, trust and performance.
Read More →
Integrating Nontraditional F&I Products
The niche presents a strategic advantage for auto dealerships as they move to adapt to fast-changing consumer expectations in today’s market.
Read More →
Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →