November Incentives Down Nearly 10 Percent Since 2009
Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,470 per vehicle sold in November, up $31, or 1.3 percent, from October 2010, but down $255, or 9.4 percent, from November 2009.
SANTA MONICA, Calif. — Edmunds.com estimated that the average automotive manufacturer incentive in the U.S. was $2,470 per vehicle sold in November, up $31, or 1.3 percent, from October 2010, but down $255, or 9.4 percent, from November 2009.
"Once again, perception trumped reality as car-shoppers pursued expected bargains during a traditional holiday deal weekend," stated Jessica Caldwell, director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com. "In truth, incentives simply aren’t increasing at the rates suggested by the year-end advertising campaigns.”
According to Edmunds.com, combined incentives spending for domestic manufacturers averaged $3,221 per vehicle sold in November 2010, up from $3,115 in October 2010. However, European automakers decreased incentives spending by $94 to $2,285 per vehicle sold; Japanese automakers decreased incentives spending by $28 to $1,784 per vehicle sold; and Korean automakers decreased incentives spending by $27 to $1,571 per vehicle sold.
True Cost of Incentives for the Top Six Automakers | ||||||
Automaker | November 2010 | October 2010 | November 2009 | |||
Chrysler Group | $2,975 | $2,880 | $3,190 | |||
Ford | $3,206 | $3,135 | $3,084 | |||
General Motors | $3,345 | $3,215 | $4,361 | |||
Honda | $1,422 | $1,402 | $1,296 | |||
Nissan | $2,179 | $2,213 | $2,170 | |||
Toyota | $1,948 | $2,066 | $1,777 | |||
Industry Average | $2,470 | $2,439 | $2,725 | |||
In November 2010, the industry's aggregate incentive spending is estimated to have totaled approximately $2.14 billion, down 7.4 percent from October 2010. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors spent an aggregate of $1.3 billion, or 59.3 percent of the total; Japanese manufacturers spent $570 million, or 26.7 percent; European manufacturers spent $193 million, or 9.0 percent; and Korean manufacturers spent $107 million, or 5.0 percent.
"Compared with November last year, GM cut its incentive spend by the largest percentage — 23 percent — of the Big 6 automakers. Toyota, still trying to dig itself out from the sales decline it experienced due to its many recalls this year, has increased incentives most of the Big 6 at 10 percent. Honda, which rides Toyota's coattails, also boosted its incentives by 10 percent on a year-to-year basis," reported Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Michelle Krebs in her analysis of November sales trends on AutoObserver.com.
Among vehicle segments, premium sport cars had the highest average incentives, $5,811 per vehicle sold, followed by premium luxury cars at $5,057. Subcompact cars had the lowest average incentives per vehicle sold, $1,272, followed by sport cars at $1,422. Analysis of incentives expenditures as a percentage of average sticker price for each segment shows large cars averaged the highest, 13.2 percent, followed by large trucks at 10.3. Sport cars averaged the lowest with 3.8 percent and luxury SUVs followed with 4.6 percent.
Comparing all brands, in November smart spent the least, $519 per vehicle sold, followed by Subaru at $548. At the other end of the spectrum, Mercury spent the most, $6,927, followed by Cadillac at $5,340. Relative to their vehicle prices, Mercury and Saab spent the most, 23.2 percent and 12.6 percent of sticker price, respectively; while Porsche spent 1.5 and Subaru spent 2.1 percent.
More F&I

How AI-Powered Coaching Is Transforming F&I Performance
See how AI-powered coaching can turn F&I customer conversations into actionable insights that support compliance, performance and profitability
Read More →
Sell Value, Build Trust
In this video, Trent White explains why selling on value, not fear, builds lasting customer trust, reduces cancellations, and drives long-term success.
Read More →
F&I Sales Give Dealers First-Half Lift
Product business shored up total profits to avoid an overall revenue tanking as product penetrations held steady, StoneEagle reported.
Read More →
Targeted Training Drives Results
Today’s technology, instead of threatening F&I managers, can actually make them better, according to an industry veteran who’s watched market setbacks roil the unprepared.
Read More →
Double the Change, Double the Chance
When an F&I manager gets a customer refusal, it’s a wise move to tweak more than one thing in the product offering.
Read More →
Just Do It
F&I managers need training, but instead of resisting application or expecting perfection, they should improve by simply acting on what they learn.
Read More →
Dealer Lender Preferences Revealed
When lenders provide consistent, fast service, their overall satisfaction scores with dealers greatly improve, according to JD Power research.
Read More →
Leading with Purpose
In this video, Trent White explains how understanding your people’s 'why' is a key leadership responsibility of F&I professionals and how that mindset drives dealership engagement, trust and performance.
Read More →
Integrating Nontraditional F&I Products
The niche presents a strategic advantage for auto dealerships as they move to adapt to fast-changing consumer expectations in today’s market.
Read More →
Trust Is Personal
Technology, no matter how efficient, can’t replace what the human F&I manager can do, which is to bridge the divide between cyberspace and the in-store experience.
Read More →